Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One  (Read 384 times)

Online Fred Litwin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One
« on: Today at 12:48:48 PM »
Advertisement
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/should-we-believe-victor-marchetti-part-one

Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One

A recent article by Jefferson Morley touted the importance of Victor Marchetti, author of The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence. In Part One of this three-part series, I show that Marchetti said that Clay Shaw was just a contact source for the CIA, not a CIA operative. Part Two will show that he part of a hoax to tie the CIA and E. Howard Hunt to the JFK assassination. Part three will examine his character.

JFK Assassination Forum

Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One
« on: Today at 12:48:48 PM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1870
Re: Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One
« Reply #1 on: Today at 12:56:12 PM »
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/should-we-believe-victor-marchetti-part-one

Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One

A recent article by Jefferson Morley touted the importance of Victor Marchetti, author of The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence. In Part One of this three-part series, I show that Marchetti said that Clay Shaw was just a contact source for the CIA, not a CIA operative. Part Two will show that he part of a hoax to tie the CIA and E. Howard Hunt to the JFK assassination. Part three will examine his character.

Dear Fred,

How many typos are there in this sentence, one or two?

"Part Two will show that he part of a hoax to tie the CIA and E. Howard Hunt to the JFK assassination."

-- Tom

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1870
Re: Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One
« Reply #2 on: Today at 03:37:47 PM »
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/should-we-believe-victor-marchetti-part-one

Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One

A recent article by Jefferson Morley touted the importance of Victor Marchetti, author of The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence. In Part One of this three-part series, I show that Marchetti said that Clay Shaw was just a contact source for the CIA, not a CIA operative. Part Two will show that he (sic) part of a hoax to tie the CIA and E. Howard Hunt to the JFK assassination. Part three will examine his character.

Dear Fred,

Did you know that a probable KGB "mole," Bruce Solie, was "all over the Kennedy investigation and all over Clay Shaw for Jim Garrison," according to (JFKA CT!!!) Malcolm Blunt?

-- Tom

Note: Blunt said "Jim DiEugenio . . . Jim DiEugenio" when he meant to say "Jim Garrison . . . Jim Garrison."


« Last Edit: Today at 03:45:39 PM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One
« Reply #2 on: Today at 03:37:47 PM »


Online Michael T. Griffith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1252
    • JFK Assassination Website
Re: Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One
« Reply #3 on: Today at 04:14:40 PM »
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/should-we-believe-victor-marchetti-part-one

Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One

A recent article by Jefferson Morley touted the importance of Victor Marchetti, author of The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence. In Part One of this three-part series, I show that Marchetti said that Clay Shaw was just a contact source for the CIA, not a CIA operative. Part Two will show that he part of a hoax to tie the CIA and E. Howard Hunt to the JFK assassination. Part three will examine his character.

IOW, every single solitary person or witness who has come forward with information indicating conspiracy was either lying, crazy, or misremembering. The 20-plus autopsy witnesses, including the morticians, who saw a large back-of-wound. The Parkland doctors and nurses who saw a large back-of-head wound. The Dallas funeral worker who could feel the edges of the large back-of-head wound. The autopsy doctors themselves, who swore up and down that they saw a fragment trail that ran from the EOP to a point behind the eye. Dr. Fred Hodges. Paul Landis. Dr. James Young. Sam Holland. Leonard Hutchinson. Officer D. V. Harkness. Officer Joe Smith. Danny Arce. Arnold Rowland. Lillian Mooneyham. James Simmons. Silvia Odio. Antonio Veciana. Warren Reynolds. Acqilla Clemons. Abraham Bolden. Richard Case Nagell. Gordon Arnold. Lee Bowers. Ed Hoffman. Albert Bogard. The Clinton-Jackson witnesses who said they saw Oswald with David Ferrie. Domingo Benavides. Don Adams. Joseph Milteer. William Somersett. Homer Wood. Sterling Wood. Eusebio Azcue. Dean Andrews. Lt. Col. Daniel Marvin. Buell Wesley Frazier. Lt. Frank Fruge. Rose Cheramie. Julia Ann Mercer. Adrian Alba. The HSCA's six acoustical scientists. Victoria Adams. Sandra Styles. Dorothy Garner. Ochus Campbell. Dolores Kounas. Austin Miller. A. J. Millican. Mary Woodward.

And on and on and on and on and on we could go.

According to you, every single one of these people was lying, crazy, or mistaken.

If just one of them was correct, the lone-gunman theory collapses.

That is a mighty fragile theory. No wonder 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world doesn't buy it.











« Last Edit: Today at 04:15:59 PM by Michael T. Griffith »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Should We Believe Victor Marchetti?, Part One
« Reply #3 on: Today at 04:14:40 PM »