JFK Conspiracy Theorists Who Earn Their Reputation as Crackpots

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: JFK Conspiracy Theorists Who Earn Their Reputation as Crackpots  (Read 7673 times)

Offline Tommy Shanks

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 213
Re: JFK Conspiracy Theorists Who Earn Their Reputation as Crackpots
« Reply #14 on: September 18, 2025, 05:24:48 PM »
Likely that was William N.

It is a large dollop of excrement on the JFKA research community escutcheon that W is a moderator of the EF-JFKA.

Yes, W quotes the anti-Semitic lunatics at Ron Unz, and promotes the theory that the Jews and Mossad perped the 9/11 event, by placing many hundreds of timed explosives in the WTC towers and setting them off after the jets struck. You can't make this stuff up.

Sadly, the JFKA research community has certain less pleasant characters, and also those with agendas.

I agree with you that Pat Speer, Tink Thompson, Larry Hancock, David Boylan, and a few others just want to know what happened. Me too.


The current moderators over there are jokes in the serious research community. It's really sad what has happened to that place.

Offline Michael T. Griffith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1529
    • JFK Assassination Website
Re: JFK Conspiracy Theorists Who Earn Their Reputation as Crackpots
« Reply #15 on: September 18, 2025, 08:17:05 PM »
The problem is, they were given only 5.6 seconds to fire all three shots. Oswald, on the other hand, took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots in the echo chamber known as Dealey Plaza.

I've already answered this argument, yet you repeat and say nothing about the contrary facts and points that I presented to you. You just keep repeating debunked arguments.

You can only expand the firing time to 10.2 seconds with the cockamamie theory that your supposed expert shooter was foolish enough to fire almost straight down and dumb enough to fire when a traffic-signal pole or tree limb was in or near his center of aim. That's ridiculous. An amateur would know better than to make such a stupid mistake.

You're also overlooking the fact that all the riflemen in the WC and CBS rifle tests were allowed to take as much time as they wanted for their first shot. We don't have the target boards for the CBS test, but we do have the ones from the WC test. Look at the first-shot target board. Only one of the shots landed in the head and neck area of the target silhouette, while the rest landed several inches below the neck area of the silhouette.

Look at the second target silhouette: One bullet barely landed in the head and neck area, landing at the very top edge of the head of the silhouette, while the other shots were even farther away from the head and neck area than the other shots on the first-shot target, and three of them missed the silhouette entirely. And these were Master-rated riflemen firing from only 30 feet up.

Moreover, Hendrix took 8 seconds for his first set of shots and 7 seconds for his second set, while Staley took 6.75 seconds for his first set and 6.45 seconds for his second set.

Miller fired more rapidly (5.15 and 4.45 seconds), but his shots were also the most inaccurate.

Even though Hendrix took 8 seconds and then 7 seconds, he failed to duplicate Oswald's alleged feat. Needless to say, Miller and Staley also failed to do so.








Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: JFK Conspiracy Theorists Who Earn Their Reputation as Crackpots
« Reply #16 on: September 18, 2025, 08:56:17 PM »
I've already answered this argument, yet you repeat and say nothing about the contrary facts and points that I presented to you. You just keep repeating debunked arguments.

You can only expand the firing time to 10.2 seconds with the cockamamie theory that your supposed expert shooter was foolish enough to fire almost straight down and dumb enough to fire when a traffic-signal pole or tree limb was in or near his center of aim. That's ridiculous. An amateur would know better than to make such a stupid mistake.

You're also overlooking the fact that all the riflemen in the WC and CBS rifle tests were allowed to take as much time as they wanted for their first shot. We don't have the target boards for the CBS test, but we do have the ones from the WC test. Look at the first-shot target board. Only one of the shots landed in the head and neck area of the target silhouette, while the rest landed several inches below the neck area of the silhouette.

Look at the second target silhouette: One bullet barely landed in the head and neck area, landing at the very top edge of the head of the silhouette, while the other shots were even farther away from the head and neck area than the other shots on the first-shot target, and three of them missed the silhouette entirely. And these were Master-rated riflemen firing from only 30 feet up.

Moreover, Hendrix took 8 seconds for his first set of shots and 7 seconds for his second set, while Staley took 6.75 seconds for his first set and 6.45 seconds for his second set.

Miller fired more rapidly (5.15 and 4.45 seconds), but his shots were also the most inaccurate.

Even though Hendrix took 8 seconds and then 7 seconds, he failed to duplicate Oswald's alleged feat. Needless to say, Miller and Staley also failed to do so.

Dear Comrade Griffith,

The limo and JFK were well past the traffic signal's mast arm when Oswald, standing and leaning forward awkwardly for the steeply-downward-angled shot, fired and missed everything half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133.

-- Tom
« Last Edit: September 18, 2025, 08:57:36 PM by Tom Graves »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
Re: JFK Conspiracy Theorists Who Earn Their Reputation as Crackpots
« Reply #17 on: September 18, 2025, 09:15:56 PM »
Dear Comrade Griffith,

The limo and JFK were well past the traffic signal's mast arm when Oswald, standing and leaning forward awkwardly for the steeply-downward-angled shot, fired and missed everything half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133.

-- Tom

   Like the Calvery stuff, there is Zero Evidence of anybody firing from a standing position in the "made to sit down" sniper's nest. And claiming the firing straight down through a 1/4 open window happened when Zapruder was Not filming, is like blaming a dead guy for an unsolved murder.