It's not my "opinion." Levine's and Manchester's statements that the autopsy doctors knew about the throat wound before the autopsy are not my "opinion"--I've merely quoted what they said. The photos that show JFK's tie knot squarely centered in the middle of his collar band during the motorcade are not my "opinion." Dr. Carrico's, Dr. Jones', and Dr. Goldstrich's statements that the throat wound was above the tie knot are not my "opinion." The evidence photos of JFK's tie and shirt slits are not my "opinion." The fact that no fabric was missing from the shirt slits and that the FBI found no metallic traces around the slits is not my "opinion." And on and on I could go.
Then you've had your eyes covered. What about the motorcade photos that prove JFK's tie knot was centered in the middle of the collar band? What about the evidence photos of the tie and shirt slits? What about the fact that the damage behind and below the throat wound was larger than the throat wound itself, an ironclad indicator of an entry wound? What about the rear holes in the JFK's shirt and coat, which prove the back wound was well below the throat wound (and which are corroborated by the death certificate, the autopsy face sheet, and the Sibert and O'Neill HSCA wound diagrams)?
I notice you ignored the point that the autopsy photos do not show the throat wound in its original condition and do not show the wound when JFK was wearing a shirt and tie, not to mention the numerous objections to the autopsy photos' reliability and authenticity (e.g., the drastic conflict between the skull x-rays and the brain photos, which you keep ducking, and the drastic conflict between the skull x-rays and the autopsy report).
I ask again: If the throat wound was much lower, then how could a bullet exiting that wound and then exiting the shirt slits have avoided tearing through the tie knot, much less magically weaved around the body of the knot to nick the knot's outer surface inward from the left edge, given that we know that JFK's tie knot was centered in the middle of his collar band and that there was no hole through the tie?
Once more, you don't know what you're talking about. One, Thompson did not say in Six Seconds in Dallas that "Oswald" fired two shots. He argued that Oswald was not even on the sixth floor during the shooting. Two, Thompson said in Six Seconds in Dallas that at least four shots were fired and that there was more than one gunman--and that is still his position.
It's not my "opinion." Levine's and Manchester's statements that the autopsy doctors knew about the throat wound before the autopsy are not my "opinion"--I've merely quoted what they said. The photos that show JFK's tie knot squarely centered in the middle of his collar band during the motorcade are not my "opinion." Dr. Carrico's, Dr. Jones', and Dr. Goldstrich's statements that the throat wound was above the tie knot are not my "opinion." The evidence photos of JFK's tie and shirt slits are not my "opinion." The fact that no fabric was missing from the shirt slits and that the FBI found no metallic traces around the slits is not my "opinion." And on and on I could go.
Yes, it is just your opinion. The photo shows you what need to know. J Mytton placed the tie on the photo with his magic. You should remember that I think he did in response to this silly crap currently being posted by you.
I notice you ignored the point that the autopsy photos do not show the throat wound in its original condition and do not show the wound when JFK was wearing a shirt and tie, not to mention the numerous objections to the autopsy photos' reliability and authenticity (e.g., the drastic conflict between the skull x-rays and the brain photos, which you keep ducking, and the drastic conflict between the skull x-rays and the autopsy report).
More of the same nonsense. Is there an end to it. The wound is clearly visible in the photo. Can you not see it in your copy of the photo.
Once more, you don't know what you're talking about. One, Thompson did not say in Six Seconds in Dallas that "Oswald" fired two shots. He argued that Oswald was not even on the sixth floor during the shooting. Two, Thompson said in Six Seconds in Dallas that at least four shots were fired and that there was more than one gunman--and that is still his position.
No that is completely wrong, nice try though.
Six Seconds in Dallas Page page 146
“Thus the cartridge case that had an extra dent in the lip seemed to lack a mark exhibited by every other shell we know to have been in the
breech of Oswalds rifle.
The combination of these factors---- the peculiar accorded treatment accorded CE 543 by the Dallas Police, its inexplicable dent on the dented lip, the sets of three marks on the base absent on the other cases while present on CE 543 and finally its lack of the characteristic chambering mark----suggests that although two of the cartridges case may have been
ejected from Oswald’s rifle, the third, CE543, is most likely an extra, unfired shell, and possibly a deliberate fake. Such a conclusion would mate perfectly with the description of events earlier laid down, namely,
that only two of the shots fired that day in Dealey Plaza came from Oswald's rifle.” Josiah had absolutely no problem identifying the carcano rifle as having belonged to LHO. He referred to the rifle as belonging to LHO three times in this short excerpt.
Any headway on proving the third shot or just more dodging the issue?
