NEW ARTICLE: JFK's Clothing Proves the Single-Bullet Theory Is Impossible

[Tommy Shanks]

He thinks Babushka Lady (who he says was really the CIA agent June Cobb) possibly used a gun camera. That "possibly" covers a lot of ground in conspiracy world.

My guess is he thinks it came from that gun. Well, "possibly".

Precisely. Griffith and others have no explanation for where all these extra bullets came from and absconded off to other than waving the whole issue away by claiming that the evidence was instead tampered with or faked.

[Michael T. Griffith]

Precisely. Griffith and others have no explanation for where all these extra bullets came from and absconded off to other than waving the whole issue away by claiming that the evidence was instead tampered with or faked.

How does this evasive polemic explain the hard physical evidence of the tie, the shirt slits, and the rear clothing holes? Your argument amounts to saying,

"I'm not going to deal with the actual physical evidence itself because WC skeptics can't explain--to my satisfaction--where the extra bullets came from or what happened to them."

You're falling back on theory and assumption to avoid dealing with hard physical evidence that you can't explain, even though that physical evidence refutes your theory and assumption.

We both know you have no idea how a bullet exiting the throat and then the slits could have avoided tearing through the tie knot, or how the bullet could have magically managed to nick the top surface of the knot without going through the knot. It is obvious to any rational, objective person that no bullet exiting the slits could have done these things. There's no way it could have missed the knot, and there's no way it could have navigated around the knot and nicked the knot's top surface, especially since the nick was not on the edge of the knot.

We all know this, but you guys won't admit it because doing so would require you to ditch the lone-gunman theory.

Incidentally, you might want to read my article "Extra Bullets and Missed Shots in Dealey Plaza":

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WRwhDQ9HMydf5pICsHwgtkoNKw0YSO8T/view

Quote from Lance Payette on Today at 02:19:46 PM
I also see that you don't even mention JFK's brace, which seems a curious omission.

Actually, I do in fact mention JFK's back brace in the article, but not in relation to the tie or the shirt slits. I mention it when discussing Sibert's HSCA interview by noting that Sibert said he rejected the bunched-clothing theory because the back brace would have helped to prevent JFK's shirt from bunching substantially:

Sibert said he rejected the theory that the shirt and coat bunched high enough to account
for the location of the clothing holes, observing that the shirt would not have moved markedly
even if Kennedy had raised his arm and that the president's back brace would have helped
to hold the shirt in place (Sibert deposition, p. 162). (p. 16)

I guess you missed that when you skimmed through the article.