There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.  (Read 15518 times)

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3534
Re: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.
« Reply #16 on: September 04, 2025, 09:59:19 PM »
Advertisement
Dear Dan,

I didn't create that photo with the red letters.

I'm guessing that either Sandy Larsen or Linda Giovanna Zambinini (sp?) did, but IDK for sure. Regardless, I don't think I ever said that was Shelley with his back to the camera.

Do you think that's Shelley?

If so, why?

I remain open-minded as to whether or not that's Joe Molina with whom Gloria Calvery is apparently talking with on the steps.

Do you think Mark Tyler's representation of what Lovelady did after Calvery spoke with him in the street (and continued on to the steps) is accurate, buddy?

Please read the post before replying.
This is REPLY#5 taken from the  "Was G. Calvery talking with Joe Molina on the steps 30 seconds after the shots?" thread."
Your incorrect identification of Joe Molina on the steps is dealt with in this post.
Your incorrect identification of Shelley and Lovelady walking down the Elm Street extension is dealt with in this post.
FYI, I created the image with the red lettering.

"Do you think Mark Tyler's representation of what Lovelady did after Calvery spoke with him in the street (and continued on to the steps) is accurate, buddy?"

IMO Tyler's animation is a staggering achievement but it is not without it's minor flaws and the movement of Lovelady it represents is one of them.
Lovelady [84 in the animation] stays on the front steps after the shots and is still there when Gloria runs up to the front steps and tells everyone there that the President has been shot. He does not come off the steps to meet her in the street. There is no a scrap of testimony by anyone to suggest this is the case so it is hard to know why Tyler has depicted this.
Shelley came off the steps and moved to the concrete spur that divides Elm Street from the Elm Street extension. He met Gloria, who was running from the shooting she had just witnessed, back to the TSBD building. Shelley then came back to the building after doing so.
The picture with the red letters shows the moment Gloria was telling Lovelady about the shooting on the front steps. Shelley is seen near the bottom of the steps having just returned from the concrete spur.

Tyler includes Gloria's interaction with officer Joe Smith [80 in the animation] where she tells him that someone was shooting from the bushes near the pergola after which Smith races off down the extension.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.
« Reply #16 on: September 04, 2025, 09:59:19 PM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1765
Re: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.
« Reply #17 on: September 04, 2025, 10:10:33 PM »
I think you may have misread what he is saying (or maybe I am). Perhaps he should be invited to clarify his thinking here? (In fact, I'm going to do that right now.)

What I liked about his Technical Reference Manual is that it is both comprehensive and non-dogmatic.

The red herring (in his opinion) that he dismisses is: "A common red herring is where writers discuss a missed shot before Z180, and then within a few seconds a second shot around Z210-Z220."

FWIW, these are the points he says he is "certain" about. ("Bursts" does not mean he thinks more than one shot was necessarily fired in each such "burst." It's his way of dealing with the evidence in a non-dogmatic way.)

 • Only three bursts of gunfire were fired in Dealey Plaza because no witness heard a fourth burst.
 • Any witness who heard more than three shots grouped two or more shots together within just one burst (such as two shots fired within a second).
 • The Zapruder film identifies when two of these bursts were fired due to the reactions of the victims at Z225 and Z313, which means the sound of gun fire reverberated around Dealey Plaza at those points in time.
 • The first gunshot fired was after Z180 and became audible to the witnesses soon after. Most witnesses close to the Presidential limo associate this burst of noise with JFK’s reaction we see after Z225 of the Zapruder film.
 • The third burst of gunfire was fired some seconds after Z313, probably aroundZ360-Z400, because so many witnesses heard a shot or shots fired well after Z313.
 • A sniper was located in the sixth floor window of the TSBD who fired three shots, as reported by a number of witnesses including Amos Euins, Howard Brennan, and Harold Norman.

IMHO, Tyler's got a lot of darn gall to call a missing-everything shot before Z-180 a "red herring."

To do so ignores Roselle's and Scearce's 2020 findings that five people in the limo and two others near it consciously reacted almost simultaneously to a loud sound around Z-145, not only suggesting that there was a missing-everything shot before Z-180, but that it occurred about three seconds earlier, i.e., around hypothetical "Z-124," half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133.

https://www.acsr.org/post/estimating-occult-timing-of-surprise-gunshot-sounds-in-silent-film-via-observed-start-of-human-vol
« Last Edit: September 04, 2025, 10:17:51 PM by Tom Graves »

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3534
Re: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.
« Reply #18 on: September 04, 2025, 10:23:16 PM »
IMHO, Tyler's got a lot of darn gall to call a missing-everything shot before Z-180 a "red herring."

To do so ignores Roselle's and Scearce's 2020 findings that five people in the limo and two others near it consciously reacted almost simultaneously to a loud sound around Z-145, not only suggesting that there was a missing-everything shot before Z-180, but that it occurred around hypothetical "Z-124," i.e., half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133.

The Roselle/Searce nonsense is a joke. It's a bunch of unsubstantiated guesses dressed as science.
But let's not wander off down that yellow brick road.
Your identification of Lovelady and Shelley as the men wandering down the Elm Street extension is incorrect for many reasons.
As is your identification of Molina on the steps.
As is the whole premise for this thread.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.
« Reply #18 on: September 04, 2025, 10:23:16 PM »


Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 793
Re: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.
« Reply #19 on: September 04, 2025, 11:29:35 PM »
IMHO, Tyler's got a lot of darn gall to call a missing-everything shot before Z-180 a "red herring."

To do so ignores Roselle's and Scearce's 2020 findings that five people in the limo and two others near it consciously reacted almost simultaneously to a loud sound around Z-145, not only suggesting that there was a missing-everything shot before Z-180, but that it occurred about three seconds earlier, i.e., around hypothetical "Z-124," half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133.

https://www.acsr.org/post/estimating-occult-timing-of-surprise-gunshot-sounds-in-silent-film-via-observed-start-of-human-vol
Voila! Thanks to the occult powers of my JFK Autograph Model Ouija Board, I have discovered that Mark Tyler is (or was) a member of the forum and participated quite genially on the thread by Marjan Rynkiewicz to the effect that the first shot was at Z105 or Z113, to wit:

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2862.0.html

I didn't read it all, I'll admit, because my eyes glaze over and the propellor on my beanie needs new batteries, but if Mark Tyler has "a lot of darn gall" it appears to be pretty well-thought-out gall. Maybe he's a KGB plant, ya think?

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1765
Re: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.
« Reply #20 on: September 04, 2025, 11:32:37 PM »
Voila! Thanks to the occult powers of my JFK Autograph Model Ouija Board, I have discovered that Mark Tyler is (or was) a member of the forum and participated quite genially on the thread by Marjan Rynkiewicz to the effect that the first shot was at Z105 or Z113, to wit:

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2862.0.html

I didn't read it all, I'll admit, because my eyes glaze over and the propellor on my beanie needs new batteries, but if Mark Tyler has "a lot of darn gall" it appears to be pretty well-thought-out gall. Maybe he's a KGB plant, ya think?

Pardon my French.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.
« Reply #20 on: September 04, 2025, 11:32:37 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3852
Re: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.
« Reply #21 on: September 05, 2025, 12:50:54 AM »

  There's No Evidence of an alleged "early" shot. Some of you are basically playing your own game of "Charades" as you apply your own personal interpretation of the actions of people viewing the JFK Motorcade. That is Not Evidence. But let's say there was an early shot at Z113. With the Kill Shot being at Z313, you are talking about the JFK Limo being under steady fire for 11+ seconds. Yet, ALL of those SS Agents did absolutely nothing over that 11+ seconds time period to stop the assassin(s)? Seriously? If you're gonna claim an early shot, you are then proving a Conspiracy based on the inaction of the entire SS while under consistent fire for 11+ seconds.   

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3534
Re: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.
« Reply #22 on: September 05, 2025, 12:54:40 AM »
  There's No Evidence of an alleged "early" shot. Some of you are basically playing your own game of "Charades" as you apply your own personal interpretation of the actions of people viewing the JFK Motorcade. That is Not Evidence. But let's say there was an early shot at Z113. With the Kill Shot being at Z313, you are talking about the JFK Limo being under steady fire for 11+ seconds. Yet, ALL of those SS Agents did absolutely nothing over that 11+ seconds time period to stop the assassin(s)? Seriously? If you're gonna claim an early shot, you are then proving a Conspiracy based on the inaction of the entire SS while under consistent fire for 11+ seconds.

Tyler makes the same point about the SS agents:

"In the Zapruder film we see no sudden reactions from the Secret Service agents at all from Z133-Z195 which leads me to believe that there were no shots at all until after Z180.  Several people standing at the lamppost by the Thornton freeway sign specifically said that the limo had either passed them or was in front of them at the first shot, which again is after Z180, thus eliminating any possibility of an early shot before that point.  Hugh Betzner took a photo at exactly Z186 and said the first shot was fired as he wound his film on, thus ruling out an earlier shot."


This is also the same point outlined in the OP of "The First Shot" thread which debunks, beyond any reasonable doubt, the notion of an early missed shot.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3852
Re: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.
« Reply #23 on: September 05, 2025, 01:15:05 AM »
Tyler makes the same point about the SS agents:

"In the Zapruder film we see no sudden reactions from the Secret Service agents at all from Z133-Z195 which leads me to believe that there were no shots at all until after Z180.  Several people standing at the lamppost by the Thornton freeway sign specifically said that the limo had either passed them or was in front of them at the first shot, which again is after Z180, thus eliminating any possibility of an early shot before that point.  Hugh Betzner took a photo at exactly Z186 and said the first shot was fired as he wound his film on, thus ruling out an earlier shot."


This is also the same point outlined in the OP of "The First Shot" thread which debunks, beyond any reasonable doubt, the notion of an early missed shot.

   What you are describing with respect to the JFK Limo/Thornton Sign would also line up with the Willis Girl slowing up/stopping her run.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: There seems to be a problem with Officer Baker's testimony.
« Reply #23 on: September 05, 2025, 01:15:05 AM »