Oswald and the Dallas Police Department's Record of Planting Evidence

[Michael T. Griffith]

Mr. McCLOY. Do you solemnly swear the testimony you give at this hearing will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Mr. DAY. I do.
.....
Mr. BELIN. Do you know what Commission Exhibit No. 637 is?
Mr. DAY. This is the trace of palmprint I lifted off of the barrel of the gun after I had removed the wood.
Mr. BELIN. Does it have your name on it or your handwriting?
Mr. DAY. It has the name "J. C. Day," and also "11/22/63" written on it in my writing off the underside gun barrel near the end of foregrip, C-2766.

https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/day1.htm

Umm, yes, but when the WC then looked into Day's story about the palmprint, even they became skeptical, as we know from released WC memos. That's why they asked him to sign a sworn statement reaffirming that he lifted the palmprint. Your arguments are once again decades behind the information curve.

I notice you said nothing about the fact that Day, in violation of DPD procedure and all common sense and competence, incredibly "failed" to take a single photograph of the print on the barrel. He took photos of the worthless trigger-guard prints but not of the alleged palmprint.

I also notice you said nothing about my article on the evidence that the palmprint was planted:

"Was Oswald's Palmprint Planted on the Alleged Murder Weapon?"
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NzWhdO-Ak3nbuxl8vsy62-fpLTBMBvPx/view

I

[Benjamin Cole]

MG-

I think most JFKA researchers have concluded the WC was a prosecution, not an investigation.

But I think you should also review the HSCA, which struck me as a lot of smart and skeptical guys, and their conclusions.

The HSCA concluded LHO was the lone gunman who fired shots that struck JFK, but that there likely was a gunsel on the GK also.

It may be LHO was involved in the JFKA up to his eyeballs.