JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Oswald and the Dallas Police Department's Record of Planting Evidence
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on September 01, 2025, 05:06:38 PM ---[...]
--- End quote ---
Dear Comrade Griffith,
When it comes to planting KGB*-endorsed JFKA CT memes, nobody does it as well as you.
-- Tom
*Today's SVR and FSB
Lance Payette:
--- Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on September 07, 2025, 01:00:11 AM ---It says volumes that Lt. J. C. Day, the DPD officer who claimed he found Oswald's palmprint on the barrel of the alleged murder weapon and lifted it, refused to swear under oath that he had lifted the palmprint. We now know from internal WC memos that even the WC had strong doubts about the palmprint's origin. To resolve these doubts, the Commission asked Lt. Day to sign a sworn statement that he did in fact lift the palmprint. Day refused to do so.
Incredibly, Day failed to take a single photo of the palmprint, even though it was standard procedure to photograph all prints before lifting them. Day took photos of the worthless partial trigger-guard prints, but didn't take a single picture of the palmprint.
I discuss the many problems with the palmprint in detail in my article "Was Oswald's Palmprint Planted on the Alleged Murder Weapon?":
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NzWhdO-Ak3nbuxl8vsy62-fpLTBMBvPx/view
--- End quote ---
Fortunately for Michael, the Three Stooges can't even fabricate evidence right! Anyone notice that the supposedly fabricated evidence, such as the paper bag and palmprint, tends to be pretty inconsequential insofar as the case against Oswald is concerned? "Yeah, let's gin up a paper bag to really nail him! And make something up about a palmprint on the rifle! Because without that, we got NOTHIN'." Hey, whatever you say, Moe.
Tim Nickerson:
--- Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on September 07, 2025, 01:00:11 AM ---It says volumes that Lt. J. C. Day, the DPD officer who claimed he found Oswald's palmprint on the barrel of the alleged murder weapon and lifted it, refused to swear under oath that he had lifted the palmprint.
--- End quote ---
Mr. McCLOY. Do you solemnly swear the testimony you give at this hearing will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Mr. DAY. I do.
.....
Mr. BELIN. Do you know what Commission Exhibit No. 637 is?
Mr. DAY. This is the trace of palmprint I lifted off of the barrel of the gun after I had removed the wood.
Mr. BELIN. Does it have your name on it or your handwriting?
Mr. DAY. It has the name "J. C. Day," and also "11/22/63" written on it in my writing off the underside gun barrel near the end of foregrip, C-2766.
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/day1.htm
Michael T. Griffith:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on September 07, 2025, 02:35:08 AM ---Mr. McCLOY. Do you solemnly swear the testimony you give at this hearing will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Mr. DAY. I do.
.....
Mr. BELIN. Do you know what Commission Exhibit No. 637 is?
Mr. DAY. This is the trace of palmprint I lifted off of the barrel of the gun after I had removed the wood.
Mr. BELIN. Does it have your name on it or your handwriting?
Mr. DAY. It has the name "J. C. Day," and also "11/22/63" written on it in my writing off the underside gun barrel near the end of foregrip, C-2766.
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/day1.htm
--- End quote ---
Umm, yes, but when the WC then looked into Day's story about the palmprint, even they became skeptical, as we know from released WC memos. That's why they asked him to sign a sworn statement reaffirming that he lifted the palmprint. Your arguments are once again decades behind the information curve.
I notice you said nothing about the fact that Day, in violation of DPD procedure and all common sense and competence, incredibly "failed" to take a single photograph of the print on the barrel. He took photos of the worthless trigger-guard prints but not of the alleged palmprint.
I also notice you said nothing about my article on the evidence that the palmprint was planted:
"Was Oswald's Palmprint Planted on the Alleged Murder Weapon?"
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NzWhdO-Ak3nbuxl8vsy62-fpLTBMBvPx/view
I
Benjamin Cole:
MG-
I think most JFKA researchers have concluded the WC was a prosecution, not an investigation.
But I think you should also review the HSCA, which struck me as a lot of smart and skeptical guys, and their conclusions.
The HSCA concluded LHO was the lone gunman who fired shots that struck JFK, but that there likely was a gunsel on the GK also.
It may be LHO was involved in the JFKA up to his eyeballs.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version