JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Released File Shows J. Edgar Hoover Acknowledged Large Rear Head Wound
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on September 01, 2025, 06:54:25 AM ---When it comes to SCIENCE, you bet I'm a "Broken Record".
--- End quote ---
Comrade Storing,
It's hard to believe that someone like you, who posts about every fifth word in either ALL CAPS or with an uppercase First Letter is scientifically minded.
Instead, it seems to reflect your obsessiveness, dogmatism, and high-strung emotionality.
Did you know that, for starters, the "scientific" Knott Laboratory graphics thingy is from a video game, that it has the sniper firing from the wrong side of the window, and that it doesn't have JBC turned far enough to his right?
LOL!
Michael T. Griffith:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on August 31, 2025, 09:39:41 PM ---Dear Michael "'Useful Idiot' or Worse" Griffith, Silbert and O'Neil had a real clear, up-close view of the rear of JFK's shaved head, right? -- Tom
--- End quote ---
You don't know??? Sibert and O'Neill helped carry in the casket and unload the body. They saw the body unwrapped and placed on the autopsy table. O'Neill said that when they unwrapped the sheets from around the head, they could see a large wound in the back of the head.
Sibert and O'Neill were in the autopsy room from the time the body was brought in until just before the morticians began to prepare the body for burial. They were close enough to see JFK's lumbar scar. They were close enough to hear what Finck, Humes, and Boswell were saying to each other. They were close enough to get a good look at the back wound. They watched the repeated probes of the back wound, when JFK's body was turned and positioned "every which way" to facilitate the probing, which would have given them ample good looks at the back of his head and at the back wound.
And remember: Sibert and O'Neill were interviewed by the HSCA and even drew diagrams of the large head wound--and both placed it in the back of the head, and nowhere near the area above the right ear.
O'Neill told the ARRB that the autopsy photo of the back of the head looked like it had been "doctored in some way," and that the brain in the brain photos did not look like JFK's brain at the autopsy, that the brain at the autopsy was smaller and more damaged. Sibert said the back-of-head photos did not "at all" look like JFK's head during the autopsy, and speculated that scalp had been pulled over the back-of-head wound for the photo.
The WC didn't dare call Sibert and O'Neill to testify. Both would have flatly contradicted the SBT and would provided two more accounts of a large right-rear head wound.
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on September 01, 2025, 09:01:50 AM ---Comrade Storing,
It's hard to believe that someone like you, who posts about every fifth word in either ALL CAPS or with an uppercase First Letter is scientifically minded.
Instead, it seems to reflect your obsessiveness, dogmatism, and high-strung emotionality.
Did you know that, for starters, the "scientific" Knott Laboratory graphics thingy is from a video game, that it has the sniper firing from the wrong side of the window, and that it doesn't have JBC turned far enough to his right?
LOL!
--- End quote ---
Knott Lab Forensic SCIENCE is used to track bullet trajectories and then admitted as Evidence in courtrooms across the USA onna daily basis. It's the Gold Standard. Opinions such as yours pale in comparison to the findings of SCIENCE.
Lance Payette:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on September 01, 2025, 12:43:09 AM ---Dear Royell "Broken Record" Storing,
Aww . . . . never mind.
--- End quote ---
"Aww ... never mind" is precisely the rational response to this forum in its entirety. When was the last discussion here that was actually worth having from either a CT or LN perspective? Post something that's moderately substantive and the regulars are struck dumb. I don't know how many threads I've started to respond to out of sheer boredom and then had precisely that response: Aww ... never mind. I actually miss Team Sock Puppet, ghastly as that thought is even to me. Ditto for the Ed Forum - it's barely worth lurking for three minutes a day. Perhaps the JFKA is simply dead? It's all just ... just ... aww, never mind (although B-O-R-I-N-G is certainly the term that springs to mind).
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on September 02, 2025, 01:07:22 AM ---Knott Lab Forensic SCIENCE is used to track bullet trajectories and then admitted as Evidence in courtrooms across the USA onna daily basis. It's the Gold Standard. Opinions such as yours pale in comparison to the findings of SCIENCE.
--- End quote ---
LOL!
Good ONE, Comrade STORING!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version