JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
If it's an Entrance wound in JFK's neck, why didn't it nick his Tie?
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on September 01, 2025, 02:21:01 PM ---Yes, and notice that the nick is not on the edge, where it would have to be if it were made by an exiting bullet that did not go through the tie.
Even if someone chooses to believe that a wound "immediately below the larynx" would be below the collar band, such a wound would certainly be above the shirt slits, which were below in the inner band of the collar. Thus, no bullet exiting such a wound could have made the shirt slits, and no bullet exiting the slits could have magically weaved around the body of the tie knot and nicked the top of the tie near the knot's left edge.
Again, when Harold Weisberg finally obtained copies of the FBI photos of the tie, which prove there was no hole through the tie, the SBT was destroyed. But, SBT believers just can't bring themselves to face this fact, even though it's been established with the hard physical evidence of the tie.
--- End quote ---
Must have been sloppy scalpel work, huh?
Michael T. Griffith:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on September 01, 2025, 02:28:12 PM ---Must have been sloppy scalpel work, huh?
--- End quote ---
It was certainly hurried, frantic scalpel work. The nurses were trying to cut off JFK's shirt and tie as quickly as possible. Again, one of the Parkland nurses confirmed to Henry Hurt that the nurses made the shirt slits and the tie nick.
This explains why Weisberg and Mantik independently observed the jagged edges of a blade in the slits, why the slits had no fabric missing from them, why no metallic traces were found around the slits, and why there was no hole through the tie.
It is obvious that none of you can explain why the tie has no hole through it, why the shirt slits have no fabric missing, and how any bullet exiting the slits could have nicked the top of the tie knot without first tearing through the knot.
It's really, really simple: No bullet exited the slits. Nurses made the slicks and the tie nick. The throat wound was an entrance wound, just as the Parkland doctors, who'd seen hundreds of gunshot wounds, said it was.
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on September 01, 2025, 06:52:42 PM ---It was certainly hurried, frantic scalpel work. The nurses were trying to cut off JFK's shirt and tie as quickly as possible. Again, one of the Parkland nurses confirmed to Henry Hurt that the nurses made the shirt slits and the tie nick.
This explains why Weisberg and Mantik independently observed the jagged edges of a blade in the slits, why the slits had no fabric missing from them, why no metallic traces were found around the slits, and why there was no hole through the tie.
It is obvious that none of you can explain why the tie has no hole through it, why the shirt slits have no fabric missing, and how any bullet exiting the slits could have nicked the top of the tie knot without first tearing through the knot.
It's really, really simple: No bullet exited the slits. Nurses made the slicks [sic] and the tie nick. The throat wound was an entrance wound, just as the Parkland doctors, who'd seen hundreds of gunshot wounds, said it was.
--- End quote ---
It's a miracle those nurses didn't sever his jugular vein while they were hacking away!
Michael T. Griffith:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on September 01, 2025, 10:41:03 PM ---It's a miracle those nurses didn't sever his jugular vein while they were hacking away!
--- End quote ---
They made two small overlapping slits below the inner collar band and a slight nick on the top of the tie.
I take it you're just going to keep avoiding the fact that there was no hole through the tie? This a textbook case of self-delusion and an ability to face disturbing fact.
If a bullet had exited the shirt slits, it would have to had to tear through the tie. It could not have missed the tie. It would have torn a hole through the bottom part of the tie knot. But there is no hole through the tie. There is only a small nick on top of the tie knot near the left edge of the knot. Obviously, no bullet could have exited the slits and then magically weaved around the body of the knot and nicked the top of the knot. At least not on this planet and not in this reality.
The FBI knew this. This is why the FBI fought so doggedly, for 10 years, to avoid releasing their photos of the tie.
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on September 02, 2025, 03:57:58 PM ---They made two small overlapping slits below the inner collar band and a slight nick on the top of the tie.
I take it you're just going to keep avoiding the fact that there was no hole through the tie? This a textbook case of self-delusion and an ability to face disturbing fact.
If a bullet had exited the shirt slits, it would have to had to tear through the tie. It could not have missed the tie. It would have torn a hole through the bottom part of the tie knot. But there is no hole through the tie. There is only a small nick on top of the tie knot near the left edge of the knot. Obviously, no bullet could have exited the slits and then magically weaved around the body of the knot and nicked the top of the knot. At least not on this planet and not in this reality.
The FBI knew this. This is why the FBI fought so doggedly, for 10 years, to avoid releasing their photos of the tie.
--- End quote ---
Dear Comrade Griffith,
Please freshen my memory:
Were the fibers of JFK's shirt and/or tie pointed outwards, or inwards?
-- Tom
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version