JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
The Three Small Puncture Wounds in JFK's Right Cheek: Proof of a Second Gunman
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Lance Payette on September 06, 2025, 06:40:01 PM ---And so what? As you seemingly always do, you weave speculation out of the thin air. If JFK's body actually were dropped, presumably someone would have noticed and mentioned that fact somewhere along the line (or was this yet another "conspiracy"?). And if it was dropped - well, so what? This would have nothing to do with Michael's goofy theory about windshield shards from a frontal shot.
If you can stomach it, Google (or AI) "embalming fluid seeping or oozing during embalming process." It can even occur because the skin is unusually thin due to the decedent's use of certain drugs. (Corticosteroids are the primary treatment for Addison's disease, and thinning of the skin is one of the primary side-effects.) There is absolutely no reason to think that Robinson's observation of embalming fluid seeping from previously unobserved spots of some sort - on a body that had been shot in the head, treated in an emergency room (including a tracheotomy), flown across the entire country, and autopsied - is anything but the proverbial nothingburger.
--- End quote ---
"Thinning skin"? Seriously? :D
Lance Payette:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on September 08, 2025, 03:47:19 PM --- "Thinning skin"? Seriously? :D
--- End quote ---
I don't know about "seriously," but it is mentioned in the technical literature on the seepage of embalming fluid.
I have no pet theory. My only observation is that (1) no one else noticed these "wounds," (2) Robinson didn't notice them until embalming fluid began to seep out, and (3) ergo, it is highly unlikely these were punctures from windshield shards as Michael suggests. My guess would be that the "wounds" were internal, not external.
When we factor in that Robinson didn't mention it to the HSCA and even an ARRB loon like Horne didn't think it was worth following up, I have to believe we are squarely in the realm of Much Ado About Nothing.
I'll bet a lot of embalming fluid would've seeped through those Huge Gates, eh? :D :D :D
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Mitch Todd on September 06, 2025, 06:09:32 AM --- "Testimony" has a number of related meanings. I figure that Purdy's Robinson "interview" fits under M-W definition #1: "a solemn declaration usually made orally by a witness under oath in response to interrogation by a lawyer or authorized public official"
Then again, whether or not I used Storing-approved terminology is unimportant. The point is that Robinson had some very different descriptions of the wounds over the years.
--- End quote ---
Above you typed, "UNDER OATH". Robinson's HSCA "Interview" was Not "under oath". You just defeated your own argument.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version