JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Did the Clark Panel Examine a Different Set of JFK Autopsy Skull X-Rays?

<< < (2/2)

Jarrett Smith:

--- Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on August 13, 2025, 07:03:27 PM ---Bumping this thread to bring to the front clear evidence of fraud in the autopsy materials. The same people who dismiss the idea that some evidence was altered or fabricated and that some government-hired experts lied or blundered are the same folks who continue to decline to explain the many facts that these things occurred.

In 1975, Dr. Fred Hodges, then the chief of neuroradiology at the John Hopkins medical school, was asked to examine the JFK autopsy materials for the Rockefeller Commission. Among other things, he noted in his report that a "goodly portion" of the right brain was "missing":

AP and two lateral views show. . . . A goodly portion of the right brain is
apparently missing and the anterior part of the right cranial cavity contains air.
(https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=32027#relPageId=3, p. 2)

The absence of a good portion of the right side of the brain means the autopsy brain photos are fraudulent. They show no more than 1-2 ounces of brain tissue missing from the entire brain, as confirmed by none other than HSCA FPP chairman Dr. Michael Baden in a recorded interview with Vincent Bugliosi.

Dr. Hodges’ observation that in the skull x-rays “a goodly portion of the right brain is apparently missing” has been confirmed by Dr. David Mantik, Dr. Michael Chesser, and Dr. Gary Aguilar. Dr. Mantik confirmed this both with direct observation and with optical density measurements, determining that over half of the right side of the brain is missing in the skull x-rays.

Further confirmation of a large amount of missing brain comes from a surprising source: Dr. James Humes. Humes admitted to JAMA that "two thirds of the right cerebrum had been blown away" (Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA], May 27, 1992, p. 2798).

Even the ARRB's forensic radiologist, Dr. John Fitzpatrick, who was loathe to see any evidence of fraud in the autopsy materials, said that the upper-right dark region on the AP x-ray indicates "some absence of brain" (Meeting Report: Independent Review of JFK Autopsy X-Rays and Photographs By Outside Consultant, 2/9/96, ARRB, p. 1).

But, as mentioned, the autopsy brain photos show only 1-2 ounces of brain tissue missing from the entire brain. Also, the autopsy report gives the weight of the brain as an impossible 1,500 grams, 10% larger than the average male brain weight. 1,500 grams equals 52.9 ounces, which means that the brain photos show only 2-4% of the brain missing, but the skull x-rays show much more missing brain than just 2-4%. And keep in mind that the brain photos are supposed to show the same brain that splattered 16 surfaces with brain matter during the shooting.

--- End quote ---

https://youtu.be/71VZxdYxSAQ?t=3727

Dr. Salyer tells how the real wound was.

Michael T. Griffith:

--- Quote from: Jarrett Smith on August 14, 2025, 11:33:36 PM ---Dr. Salyer tells how the real wound was.

--- End quote ---

That's a good video. A number of other Parkland doctors have said the autopsy photos are not accurate and/or have been altered. A lot of people don't understand that the wound was tangential, that the bullet created a flap along the right side of the head before it exited the right-rear part of the skull--that's what Dr. Salyer was describing. Dr. Crenshaw described the same thing. Notice, too, what Nurse Bell said in the segment after Salyer's segment: that they lifted up the scalp to show her the entire wound.

Dr. Salyer's observation that the autopsy photo he was handling showed two small rounded beveled wounds near each other is devastating to the lone-gunman case.

This being said, these points don't specifically deal with the problems under discussion: the drastic conflict between the skull x-rays and the brain photos, the failure of the autopsy doctors to mention the high fragment trail, the Clark Panel's failure to mention obvious brain damage, the fact that the skull x-rays show no low fragment trail, etc., etc.

Tom Graves:

--- Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on August 05, 2025, 06:36:16 PM ---I have sometimes wondered if the Clark Panel was given an earlier version of the altered JFK autopsy skull x-rays.

--- End quote ---

Three questions for Comrade Griffith:

1) How did the bad guys go about altering said x-rays?

2) Are these bad guys included in the 20 to 30 bad guys you've said were involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, the planting of false evidence, the getting-away, and the all-important (and ongoing!) cover up, or do you need to adjust your estimate upward a bit?

3) Does Vladimir Putin Pay you, or do you do it for free?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page