JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

SpyTalk on MOrley's Nothingburger

<< < (2/2)

Steve M. Galbraith:
Again, Carlos Bringuier, still alive, said he acted on his own. He insists that he never received directions from nor even knew Joannides. How does Morley surmount this? Ignoring it? Calling Bringuier a liar?

The other DRE delegates - Quiroga for example - never mentioned being directed by anyone. Quiroga says Bringuier sent him to talk to Oswald. Bill Stuckey, the reporter, said he acted on his own. He went to interview Oswald for his show, found him articulate, and decided to do just that. Ed Butler, the host of the radio show that held the debate, said he contacted a source in HUAC in Washington for information on Oswald. Nothing about a CIA contact.

Where's the evidence for this "operation"? This hidden hand? To be sure, they ganged up on Oswald, ambushed him. But the evidence is they did their own work, it wasn't guided by anyone. This is what they did, who they were. There's no need to direct them, they weren't pawns.

Who is impugning the integrity of witnesses? Sure seems to me that Morley is the one implicitly saying that the stories told by Bringuier, Stucky and Butler were all lies, covering up for their direction by Joannides.

And after Musk and DOGE cut the CIA funding I have to do this all for free now. I do accept Paypal if you want to help a useful idiot out.

Jon Banks:

--- Quote from: Steve M. Galbraith on July 18, 2025, 08:13:01 PM ---Again, Carlos Bringuier, still alive, said he acted on his own. He insists that he never received directions from nor even knew Joannides. How does Morley surmount this? Ignoring it? Calling Bringuier a liar?

The other DRE delegates - Quiroga for example - never mentioned being directed by anyone. Quiroga says Bringuier sent him to talk to Oswald. Bill Stuckey, the reporter, said he acted on his own. He went to interview Oswald for his show, found him articulate, and decided to do just that. Ed Butler, the host of the radio show that held the debate, said he contacted a source in HUAC in Washington for information on Oswald. Nothing about a CIA contact.

Where's the evidence for this "operation"? This hidden hand? To be sure, they ganged up on Oswald, ambushed him. But the evidence is they did their own work, it wasn't guided by anyone. This is what they did, who they were. There's no need to direct them, they weren't pawns.

Who is impugning the integrity of witnesses? Sure seems to me that Morley is the one implicitly saying that the stories told by Bringuier, Stucky and Butler were all lies, covering up for their direction by Joannides.

And after Musk and DOGE cut the CIA funding I have to do this all for free now. I do accept Paypal if you want to help a useful idiot out.

--- End quote ---

Morley has never implied that Oswald was the center or focus of the DRE's operation. He has never argued that Joannides or anyone else associated with the DRE was directly connected to Oswald or ordered to engage with Oswald.

Do you guys ever address the things Morley has actually said?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page