Dan Rather's laughable account of what he thinks he saw in the Zapruder film

[Jack Nessan]

  It is definitely worth noting exactly where DPD Motorcycle Officer Hargis STOPPED his motorcycle. Why? Because he then allegedly ran across Elm St and BACK toward the light pole. This course of action does Not line up with the actions of an officer Under Fire. And then there is the Issue of there being absolutely NO IMAGES of Officer Hargis being at the "little wall", "brick wall". Not a single image. Or a single image of SA Lem Johns running down Elm St toward the JFK Limo. ALL of these Missing Images have the common thread of allegedly happening in the LIMO STOP area.

This is definitely not worth noting and absolutely does not mean anything.

[Royell Storing]

  Have you ever watched, "The Naked Gun" (1988)?  Does, "Move along, nothing to see here", ring a bell? There's an Image Black Hole extending (E) from the N-S Picket Fence to about 1/2 way across the Knoll. And do Not forget that the Wiegman Film was pushed for decades as being filmed "continuously". That is until it was proven that the period of time that Wiegman ran Down the Knoll was Not filmed by him. Or was it?

[John Mytton]

Again, the Muchmore film shows the limo's brake lights on for half a second at a time when the Zapruder shows nothing resembling the obvious slowdown that would occur from pressing the brake pedal for 9 frames.

Griffith, are you going to get anything right? Look at this Zapruder frame very closely, the left rear taillight is glowing but the right hand side is not? The simple reason is that the taillight assembly has a red wraparound lens and from Zapruder's position the ambient light shines through the red lens.



Likewise, a similar effect can be seen from Muchmore's position.



JohnM