You're a fool.
I know resorting to name calling only weakens an argument and undermines credibility. Still a weapon of choice, absent adequate proof.
You claim what Guinyard could and could not see, even though he is telling you what he saw.
I simply don't believe him. I don't think Joseph Ball did either.
The Commission didn’t place much significance on "
his shells" or his location. Otherwise, we would have a clear image or map, similar to Callaway.
Only SG is quoted, “
...rolling them with his hand--with his thumb." I question his ability to see it that distance. Nothing supports this account.
Even the attorney reacts in a very ho-hum manner, without basic pursuit of;
How many did he see? When did he reload? Where exactly along Patton?. If as you incorrectly suggest, SG had seen the killer simply “
throw down shell casings...”, why didn't he point them out to Benevides while
he was following him around and DB was collecting the shells? - Why not confirm the number DB found from SG? Why not ask exactly where?
Dom was clear, he knew precisely where the casings landed and went straight to them. He told CBS, he found three. Gerald Hill testified,
"...3 spent jackets..."
Guinyard on the other hand, said Dom picked up
all the empty hulls from the gun. Benevides as stated, "
I knew where they was at..."
So, when did SG inform DB of what
HE supposedly saw as he followed Dom around? At the very least, these two should corroborate count. Ball never asked.
In addition to the number of shots, type of hull vs. bullet, shells "
found" later, along with the count of each, has presented a significant mess since 1963.
Sam Guinyard saw the killer fleeing the scene, and there’s no credible reason to believe he saw anything else.