The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish  (Read 55529 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #147 on: July 25, 2025, 06:49:13 PM »
   The reliance on the SBT is what consistently DQ's the Lone Nut stuff. And now they have had to almost double the elapsed shooting time to 11+ seconds and even have Oswald firing a shot while standing up down through a 1/4 open window. The LN scenario continues being forced to change the parameters. 
« Last Edit: July 25, 2025, 06:50:39 PM by Royell Storing »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #148 on: July 25, 2025, 09:09:53 PM »
   The reliance on the SBT is what consistently DQ's the Lone Nut stuff. And now they have had to almost double the elapsed shooting time to 11+ seconds and even have Oswald firing a shot while standing up down through a 1/4 open window. The LN scenario continues being forced to change the parameters.

The SBT is rock solid. As Dale Myers noted some years ago, the Single Bullet theory should really be known as the Single Bullet fact. I for one do not believe that the shooting span for the shots was 11+ seconds. That's not to say that I couldn't be convinced of it. I believe that the first shot was taken at about Z153.  The CT scenario hasn't really changed much in the past 60 years. It's one that denies the real evidence and makes up and embraces bogus stuff.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #149 on: July 25, 2025, 10:10:27 PM »
The SBT is rock solid. As Dale Myers noted some years ago, the Single Bullet theory should really be known as the Single Bullet fact. I for one do not believe that the shooting span for the shots was 11+ seconds. That's not to say that I couldn't be convinced of it. I believe that the first shot was taken at about Z153.  The CT scenario hasn't really changed much in the past 60 years. It's one that denies the real evidence and makes up and embraces bogus stuff.

    The LN's have been forced into: (1) Extending the elapsed firing time to 11+ seconds, (2) Oswald firing Shot #1 from a Standing Position straight down through the 1/4 open window, (3) Then sitting down to fire shots #2 and #3, and (4) Moving the physical position of the JFK Limo on Elm St. And this, "SBT is rock solid"? The SBT has been proven "Impossible" by Knott Lab FORENSIC SCIENCE. Nothing science based has ever Proven the SBT. Back when the pandemic was running wild, all we ever heard was, "follow the science". Following Science also applies with respect to the SBT being declared "Impossible".

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #150 on: July 25, 2025, 10:46:55 PM »
    The LN's have been forced into: (1) Extending the elapsed firing time to 11+ seconds, (2) Oswald firing Shot #1 from a Standing Position straight down through the 1/4 open window, (3) Then sitting down to fire shots #2 and #3, and (4) Moving the physical position of the JFK Limo on Elm St.


Name the LNs who have been forced into : (1) Extending the elapsed firing time to 11+ seconds, (2) Oswald firing Shot #1 from a Standing Position straight down through the 1/4 open window, (3) Then sitting down to fire shots #2 and #3, and (4) Moving the physical position of the JFK Limo on Elm St.

Quote
And this, "SBT is rock solid"? The SBT has been proven "Impossible" by Knott Lab FORENSIC SCIENCE. Nothing science based has ever Proven the SBT. Back when the pandemic was running wild, all we ever heard was, "follow the science". Following Science also applies with respect to the SBT being declared "Impossible".

Where can one read the Knott study? Not a synopsis of the study or a video synopsis of it, but the actual full study itself. What generation copy, or copies, of the Zapruder film did they use? Did they use the Betzner and Willis photos? If so, what generation copies were they? How far inboard of JFK did they determine Connally to be? Did they factor in the right rotation of Connally when concluding that the SBT could not work? It seems that they did not. How do you defend that?






« Last Edit: July 25, 2025, 10:47:48 PM by Tim Nickerson »

Online Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1191
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #151 on: July 25, 2025, 11:06:32 PM »
It’s already a sloppy job by one shooter, so if there’s some idea here that there’s another shooter because of a Knotts Lab  study then that’ would be 2X as sloppy plan that makes no sense at all if Oswald is the being set up as a patsy. It’s an unnecessary complication introducing a different bullet that might  hit JC and have be to replaced after the fact by more complication of swapping out the bullet and falsifying report of witnesses who saw a “pointed bullet”.

Online Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1191
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #152 on: July 25, 2025, 11:34:33 PM »
That “dingy white” T shirt Oswald had on when he was arrested means apparently he did not change that T shirt for a cleaner fresh T shirt when he changed out that lighter reddish brown shirt for the  brown shirt with hole in the sleeve.

Seems to be another inconsistency imo because it only takes another 30 secs to take off the smelly dingy T shirt and put on a clean dry non dingy white T shirt while in the process of changing to the brown shirt.

Not sure how Arnold Rowland could see “blue” if Oswald was the rifle displaying person at the SW window if Oswald was wearing a reddish brown shirt. Was Rowland colorblind?

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
« Reply #153 on: July 25, 2025, 11:37:58 PM »


Name the LNs who have been forced into : (1) Extending the elapsed firing time to 11+ seconds, (2) Oswald firing Shot #1 from a Standing Position straight down through the 1/4 open window, (3) Then sitting down to fire shots #2 and #3, and (4) Moving the physical position of the JFK Limo on Elm St.

Where can one read the Knott study? Not a synopsis of the study or a video synopsis of it, but the actual full study itself. What generation copy, or copies, of the Zapruder film did they use? Did they use the Betzner and Willis photos? If so, what generation copies were they? How far inboard of JFK did they determine Connally to be? Did they factor in the right rotation of Connally when concluding that the SBT could not work? It seems that they did not. How do you defend that?





   ALL of this moving of the goal posts is the Brainchild of Max Holland. LN's have been repeating since, "The Lost Bullet"