JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
The Assassination was Sloppy and Amateurish
Royell Storing:
A shooter positioned OUTSIDE of the N-S section of picket fencing makes a lot more sense. This possible shooter would generally be in the area of the Large Tree/Black Dog Man/Gordon Arnold/Badge Man area.
Charles Collins:
--- Quote from: Dan O'meara on July 14, 2025, 04:57:55 PM ---If the shooter was wearing a t-shirt the witnesses would have said so.
You don't believe that.
I do.
I believe Rowland is describing the same man as Fischer, Edwards and Brennan and he describes a shirt open at the collar.
I believe the witnesses would know the difference between a t-shirt and a shirt.
You don't.
Fair enough.
Just for fun, Google "Open Neck Shirt".
See if anyone else agrees with your suspect assertion that this refers to a t-shirt (spoiler alert - the dozens of images that come up have shirts open at the collar. Looks like it's only you).
--- End quote ---
I believe Rowland is describing the same man as Fischer, Edwards and Brennan and he describes a shirt open at the collar.
I believe the witnesses would know the difference between a t-shirt and a shirt.
Knowing the difference and being able to testify whether or not it was one or the other are two different things.
Mr. FISCHER - He was in the---as you're looking toward that window, he was in the lower right portion of the window. He seemed to be sitting a little forward.
And he had--he had on an open-neck shirt, but it-uh--could have been a sport shirt or a T-shirt. It was light in color; probably white, I couldn't tell whether it had long sleeves or whether it was a short-sleeved shirt, but it was open-neck and light in color.
Just for fun, Google "Open Neck Shirt".
See if anyone else agrees with your suspect assertion that this refers to a t-shirt (spoiler alert - the dozens of images that come up have shirts open at the collar. Looks like it's only you).
No, Ronald B. Fischer was an eye witness and I have posted his testimony regarding this question. It isn't only me.
Dr Alan Howard Davis:
--- Quote from: Dan O'meara on July 14, 2025, 05:10:53 PM ---"There is a volume of evidence for a second gunman behind the picket fence (would you like to explain away all of that evidence?)"
Yes, I would.
You bring on the strongest arguments for why you believe there was a gunman on the GK and I'll explain it away.
"Rather than challenging my logic,"
You're clearly unaware with how this forum works.
You might believe you get to post any nonsense you want without being challenged on it but you're wrong.
You've got to back up any claims you make.
And your "logic" regarding the TSBD shooter is non-existent so I can't challenge it.
Maybe take us through how this shooter knew the 6th floor would be available? That it wouldn't be packed with employees.
And why do you think he was a "distraction" when only two people actually saw him during the shooting out of the hundreds in Dealey Plaza. How does your "logic" equate that with a distraction? and what was he supposed to be distracting people from? The shooter on the GK?
--- End quote ---
Oh dear - you believe I came on the forum not thinking my ideas would be challenged!! It is absolutely why I came on the forum -to challenge and be challenged, but hopefully with a level of decorum. I am not going to call what you believe 'nonsense' - just misjudged or misinformed in my opinion. 'Nonsense' are conspiracy theories with no basis in fact such as the 'fake' moon landings or the flat earth. We all share the same passion to find the truth about the assassination, but our ideas differ because there are so many holes in the information available. We are all seeking to 'fill the gaps' with our own ideas, very many that are plausible if not conclusive. Debate is healthy and helpful and I hope it can continue to be friendly and informative.
Richard Smith:
--- Quote from: Dr Alan Howard Davis on July 14, 2025, 08:22:34 PM ---Oh dear - you believe I came on the forum not thinking my ideas would be challenged!! It is absolutely why I came on the forum -to challenge and be challenged, but hopefully with a level of decorum. I am not going to call what you believe 'nonsense' - just misjudged or misinformed in my opinion. 'Nonsense' are conspiracy theories with no basis in fact such as the 'fake' moon landings or the flat earth. We all share the same passion to find the truth about the assassination, but our ideas differ because there are so many holes in the information available. We are all seeking to 'fill the gaps' with our own ideas, very many that are plausible if not conclusive. Debate is healthy and helpful and I hope it can continue to be friendly and informative.
--- End quote ---
We have only a finite number of years here on Earth. Will you be getting around to your evidence soon? I've seen a lot of generalization and editorializing but not much in the way of specifics.
Dan O'meara:
--- Quote from: Charles Collins on July 14, 2025, 05:33:41 PM ---I believe Rowland is describing the same man as Fischer, Edwards and Brennan and he describes a shirt open at the collar.
I believe the witnesses would know the difference between a t-shirt and a shirt.
Knowing the difference and being able to testify whether or not it was one or the other are two different things.
Mr. FISCHER - He was in the---as you're looking toward that window, he was in the lower right portion of the window. He seemed to be sitting a little forward.
And he had--he had on an open-neck shirt, but it-uh--could have been a sport shirt or a T-shirt. It was light in color; probably white, I couldn't tell whether it had long sleeves or whether it was a short-sleeved shirt, but it was open-neck and light in color.
Just for fun, Google "Open Neck Shirt".
See if anyone else agrees with your suspect assertion that this refers to a t-shirt (spoiler alert - the dozens of images that come up have shirts open at the collar. Looks like it's only you).
No, Ronald B. Fischer was an eye witness and I have posted his testimony regarding this question. It isn't only me.
--- End quote ---
Obviously, you didn't Google "Open Neck Shirt".
You appear to be the only person on the planet who believes it can refer to a t-shirt.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version