Luna's Ridiculous Hearing

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Luna's Ridiculous Hearing  (Read 15278 times)

Online W. Tracy Parnell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
    • W. Tracy Parnell Debunking JFK Conspiracy Theories
Re: Luna's Ridiculous Hearing
« Reply #7 on: May 22, 2025, 03:28:51 PM »
Not to divert this too far but here is Hosty discussing the Walker shooting in his book "Assignment Oswald." From his account it's obvious that the FBI wasn't investigating the shooting; the DPD was. And they suspected it was someone within the Walker organization who took the shot.

It's obvious to me that Tunheim is not that well versed on some issues or he believes too many conspiracy writers.

Offline Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1874
Re: Luna's Ridiculous Hearing
« Reply #8 on: May 22, 2025, 03:57:32 PM »
It's obvious to me that Tunheim is not that well versed on some issues or he believes too many conspiracy writers.
No one on the committee was able to challenge him. Or wanted to. Can't expect them to know the details of this but that's why they have staffers. Or why the hearings should have someone on the panel like Fred or Max Holland, Posner et al. to challenge claims. This is all one-sided. And why they allowed Dr. Curtis to give his second (third? fourth?) hand account of the shooting is another problem. Maybe worse than Tunheim's testimony. Curtis wasn't saying anything about the shooting that he knew firsthand; it seemed to be entirely from things he read or heard from others.

Things like this remind me of Liebeler's complaint about debating Mark Lane: "Lane will talk for 15 minutes and it takes you four hours to correct his claims." That's always been the problem with conspiracists of any variety but especially JFK assassination types. You are always having to chase after them.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2025, 05:32:36 PM by Steve M. Galbraith »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Luna's Ridiculous Hearing
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2025, 01:05:05 AM »
Don Curtis: Then he (Specter) got the committee together, and nobody I'd ever seen before sitting behind the table, and put me on a high stool uncomfortably...And then started asking me questions.
=====================

The testimony of Dr. Don Teel Curtis was taken at 9:25 a.m., on March 24, 1964, at Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, Tex., by Mr. Arlen Specter, assistant counsel of the President's Commission.

Mr. SPECTER - Let the record show that present are Dr. Don Curtis and the court reporter, in connection with the deposition proceeding being conducted by the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, which is inquiring into all facets of the assassination, including the medical treatment performed for President Kennedy.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3500
Re: Luna's Ridiculous Hearing
« Reply #10 on: May 23, 2025, 01:24:24 AM »
In a court filing, Nelson of the CIA said Joannides was "serving undercover" during his HSCA tenure. Was he really or was it her interpretation of something she read? I don't know.

Nelson who?

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5046
Re: Luna's Ridiculous Hearing
« Reply #11 on: May 23, 2025, 02:30:44 AM »

   The Luna Hearing made it obvious that age has caught up with Oliver Stone. He's now incapable of maintaining coherent thought for better than 4 continuous minutes. I watched Tink Thompson interviewed for roughly 50 minutes on NewsNation several months ago. The same is Now true with him. I hope that both Stone and Thompson have maintained detailed journals. Both have acquired a lot of knowledge in addition to physical evidence regarding the JFK Assassination. Detectives and Cops keep records of the cases they are involved with over the course of their career. Yet, we have guys like SA Clint Hill pass and we do Not hear anything about a personal journal? Why is this? Same goes for Gary Mack. He should have had a 3 Car Garage full of Badge Man Material, McKinnon ID Issue, the Dictabelt, etc. Yet we get squadoosh. What is going on here?

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3500
Re: Luna's Ridiculous Hearing
« Reply #12 on: May 23, 2025, 02:50:32 AM »
Detectives and Cops keep records of the cases they are involved with over the course of their career. Yet, we have guys like SA Clint Hill pass and we do Not hear anything about a personal journal? Why is this? Same goes for Gary Mack. He should have had a 3 Car Garage full of Badge Man Material, McKinnon ID Issue, the Dictabelt, etc. Yet we get squadoosh. What is going on here?

Comrade Storing,

As you've been brainwashed into believing, it's all part-and-parcel of THE DEEP STATE CONSPIRACY.

Keep up the good work in spreading the disfo, Comrade!

Your buddy,

-- Vladimir Putin
« Last Edit: May 23, 2025, 06:07:14 PM by Tom Graves »

Online W. Tracy Parnell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
    • W. Tracy Parnell Debunking JFK Conspiracy Theories
Re: Luna's Ridiculous Hearing
« Reply #13 on: May 23, 2025, 03:19:27 PM »
Nelson who?

Delores Nelson of the CIA's Public Information Programs Division. She was responding to Morley's lawsuit against the CIA. That is when she made the statement about Joannides that I referenced.