An interesting question for LNers from John Simkin

[Paul J Cummings]

I find it amazing Dallas Police Chief Curry couldn't put LHO on the sixth with a gun but you can.

This is a very simple case.  The rifle used to assassinate JFK belonged to LHO.  It was found in his place of employment.  No other person has ever been associated with that rifle.  So the evidence that would lead me to conclude otherwise would relate to the rifle.  Demonstrating that it somehow was not Oswald's or that some other person had access and possession of that rifle on 11.22.  Conclusive proof that more than three shots were fired would also create doubt.  Of course, even if Oswald was the shooter, that doesn't mean he was not part of a conspiracy, but I've never seen any credible evidence of that being the case.