A Very Simple Conspiracy Redux

[Lance Payette]

I feel that the huge "inside job" was only about the control of the aftermath of the assassination. The political necessity to pin the thing on a lone nut.
I remain unconvinced that the plot to kill Kennedy was implemented by that same entity.

The cover-up to pin the JFKA on a Lone Nut doesn't mean a Lone Nut didn't do it. I happen to believe there was an effort to sell the LN narrative because of legitimate concern that Russia, Cuba and even LBJ would seem like obvious suspects to the public ... but I also believe Oswald did it. There was a secondary cover-up by the agencies with egg on their face for failing to have kept tabs on Oswald.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

I feel that the huge "inside job" was only about the control of the aftermath of the assassination. The political necessity to pin the thing on a lone nut.
I remain unconvinced that the plot to kill Kennedy was implemented by that same entity.

So they knew who really killed JFK and covered up for them? Them being? The Soviets? Castro? Rogue CIA? For political necessity at that time? And then the HSCA continued with this necessary coverup? The Church Committee? The news media?

You start with a plausible argument for the original coverup/suppression but then it all falls apart when you have to explain the subsequent coverups. By people who weren't even alive or very young at the time of the original crimes?

It's been a 60 plus year series of necessary coverups?

[Steve M. Galbraith]

In 1993, the PBS investigatory/documentary program "Frontline" devoted five years and millions of dollars investigating the assassination. The reporters and editors traveled around the world during the investigation. It culminated in the show "Who was Lee Harvey Oswald?": https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/oswald/

Conclusion: It was Oswald. Did they cover up what happened too? At some point don't you have to ask yourself, "Gosh, all of these people couldn't have been part of the coverup?"

[Jim Hawthorn]

So they knew who really killed JFK and covered up for them? Them being? The Soviets? Castro? Rogue CIA? For political necessity at that time? And then the HSCA continued with this necessary coverup? The Church Committee? The news media?

You start with a plausible argument for the original coverup/suppression but then it all falls apart when you have to explain the subsequent coverups. By people who weren't even alive or very young at the time of the original crimes?

It's been a 60 plus year series of necessary coverups?

No. Gerald Ford said (to the President of France) that they knew that there was a conspiracy but they didn't know who was behind it. This couldn't go before the American public and the rest of the world so i all had to point to the lone nut at all cost.

[Michael Walton]

Glad you mentioned Ford's statement. Right on the money. And let us not forget, too, Ford scratched out "neck" when reviewing the final draft of the Warren report. I mean, if that isn't a classic and perfect example of toeing the line to what they wanted all along, I don't know what is.

And here is that " Trump is who he is" that you can only find in a foreign news outlet. How many American outlets have said anything about this, something that's blatantly obvious if you simply watch his current behavior toward everyone EXCEPT Russia.

https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/1k17h1s/readingrussia_moscow_seems_pleased_one_paper/

[John Iacoletti]

In 1993, the PBS investigatory/documentary program "Frontline" devoted five years and millions of dollars investigating the assassination. The reporters and editors traveled around the world during the investigation. It culminated in the show "Who was Lee Harvey Oswald?": https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/oswald/

Conclusion: It was Oswald. Did they cover up what happened too? At some point don't you have to ask yourself, "Gosh, all of these people couldn't have been part of the coverup?"

Well, if it says so on TV then it must be true.

 

[Tom Graves]

Well, if it says so on TV then it must be true.

Iacoletti,

How many evil, evil bad guys and/or really, really bad gals do you figure were wittingly involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important cover up?

Just a few, or oodles and gobs?