Anyone who has spent more than one stint no matter the duration in criminal confinement for firearms violations , & assault as well as spending time in mental treatment hospitals for trying to kill themselves should qualify for the top 5 in a list of threats handed over to the President's Secret Service Advance Team.
The FBI did not believe for a second that Oswald "accidentally" shot himself by the way, given his record of active suicidal tendencies
So you believe that someone who has documented suicidal tendencies as well as current file being kept on them by the FBI, CIA, KGB, NIS, is someone that is of no particular concern in being within spitting distance from the president ?
Really?
You sound like excellent candidate for the FBI or the Keystone cops
TABLE 1. LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S DISCIPLINARY CAREER
INSTITUTION
Bethlehem Children's Home
New Orleans (1942-1943)
New York Youth House for Boys
New York City (1953)
Civil Air Patrol (light drilling unit)
New Orleans (1955)
United States Marine Corps
California and Japan (1957-1959)
(service included two courts martial and
incarceration in marine brig for 28 days)
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)
(1960_1962)31
(time included three days in Botkinskaya
Hospital Mental Unit in Moscow)
TIME
13 months at age 3-4
1 month at age 13
3-9 months at age 15
On neither thread on which I have raised the issue have you addressed what you think the significance of all this is. We can stipulate that, in retrospect, the CIA and FBI were not as diligent and coordinated in monitoring Oswald as they should have been. I am not willing to stipulate that what they knew necessarily should have required notice to the SS, but I'll do so for the sake of argument. I am certainly not willing to stipulate that the SS would have found Oswald to be a threat and would have taken any action at all, but I'll even do that for the sake of argument.
The issue remains: What point are you making? Simply that the CIA and FBI dropped the ball? That this somehow factors into some JFKA conspiracy? That it somehow explains Oswald's patsy statement? Surely you can clearly and succinctly explain what point you're making - can't you?
I find your litany of Oswald's "Disciplinary Career" almost comical. THAT is the background of someone the CIA and FBI should have concluded was an obvious threat to JFK? Yep, those little fiends from the Bethlehem Children's Home should be on the SS's radar the rest of their lives. How many people along that motorcade route do you think had backgrounds that would make Oswald look like a choir boy - "oodles and gobs," as Tom would ask?
Can you REALLY not see what you are doing - i.e., applying after-the-fact, ad hoc reasoning? We KNOW that Oswald shot JFK. Ergo, he was obviously someone capable of shooting JFK. Ergo, whatever his background was, it was the background of someone capable of shooting JFK. Ergo, the CIA and FBI should have known (or did know) about that background and should have alerted the SS about this obvious threat to JFK. Ergo, if they had, the SS would have had Oswald under control and the JFKA never would have happened. Ergo, since the CIA and/or FBI did not do this, there was a conspiracy and Oswald was a mere patsy.
It's almost a perfect example of ad hoc Conspiracy Thinking. Try explaining your point in a way that makes it look like something other than a perfect example of Conspiracy Thinking.