The Warren Commission Sham

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Warren Commission Sham  (Read 97864 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #84 on: April 01, 2025, 12:30:08 AM »
This is going nowhere, which is a pity.

In other words, it's getting difficult for you, and you're "bailing."

Which I totally understand.

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #85 on: April 01, 2025, 12:41:51 AM »
In other words, it's getting difficult for you, and you're "bailing."

Which I totally understand.

It's getting banal and boring.
Redundant questions going nowhere.
It's getting off topic and it's not worth it.


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #86 on: April 01, 2025, 12:48:31 AM »
It's getting banal and boring.

But you're "sticking to your guns" in saying there were only two conspirators (and Oswald wasn't one of them), right?

If so, could you please tell us specifically what these two people did?

Thanks!

PS Which one fired CE-399 through a pig carcass?
« Last Edit: April 01, 2025, 12:53:10 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #87 on: April 01, 2025, 01:13:49 AM »
But you're "sticking to your guns" in saying there were only two conspirators (and Oswald wasn't one of them), right?

If so, could you please tell us specifically what these two people did?

Thanks!

PS Which one fired CE-399 through a pig carcass?

Your not de-railing this thread.
I'll start another and you can ask your silly questions there but on a quid pro quo basis.

Online Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1191
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #88 on: April 01, 2025, 03:40:45 AM »
Where is the WC testimony of Dorothy Garner?
Where is the WC testimony of Sandra Stiles?
Why did  FBI agent Odum deny having ever made a report that CE399 was verified?
Why was not a forensic autopsy expert selected to do the autopsy of JFK?
Bullet fragments said to be found in the limo, ( 3 under the seat of Mrs Connally) why were they not photographed in  the position they were said to be in, under that seat?
Why was the limo windshield and the limo itself not kept as evidence?
Why was the paraffin test of Oswald’s cheeks negative, when an experiment with 7 persons who fire a rifle show all 7 test  positive?
Why was it impossible to have a tape recording of Oswald’s interrogations and have an attorney present as well?
How could Oswalds blue jacket have been found in TSBD when Whaley the taxi driver said Oswald was wearing that jacket?
Why was  Earlene Roberts not able to confirm Oswald was wearing the light gray jacket when he left the boarding house?
Why was no gunpowder residue found on the jacket, shirt sleeves or T shirt of Oswald?
Was  there ever a report of gunpowder residue found in the breech, chamber or rifle grooves of the barrel of the MC rifle found on the 6th floor TSBD?

Are any of these questions relevant? 😳

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #89 on: April 01, 2025, 05:20:49 AM »
Quote
Why did FBI agent Odum deny having ever made a report that CE399 was verified?

Question: How old was Odum in 2002 when he allegedly said that to Gary "Rudeness" Aguilar?

Answer: Eighty-two


« Last Edit: April 01, 2025, 05:21:38 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #90 on: April 01, 2025, 06:37:33 AM »
Dan O'meara said:

Quote

I am totally convinced by the evidence that both JFK and JBC were simultaneously shot through by the same bullet.

There is not a chance that this bullet was CE-399


My comment:

Neutron activation analysis expert witness Vincent P. Guinn told the HSCA that the injures to Connally's wrist were very probably caused by CE-399




« Last Edit: April 01, 2025, 06:48:45 AM by Tom Graves »