The Warren Commission Sham

[Tom Graves]

And what is your evidence that CE-399 wounded both JFK and JBC?

The evidence that CE-399 wounded both JFK and JBC is comprised of the following: the fact that a bullet like CE-399 has a tendency to start tumbling upon exiting something soft (like a block of ballistics gel or a human neck), the fact that the entry wound in JBC's back measured 15mm x 6mm, the fact that both CE-399 and the largish bullet fragments found in the limo were ballistically traced to Oswald's short-rifle, the fact that the injuries sustained by JBC's wrist were commiserate with CE-399's penetrating it backwards and sideswiping his radial bone, the fact that the damage sustained by CE-399 was commiserate with the damage it did to JBC's rib and wrist, the fact that JFK's and JBC's reactions (including JBC's hat flip, his jacket's billowing outwards and his lapel's flapping outwards) in the Zapruder film were sufficiently close in time, the fact that the bullet that exited JFK's throat had to continue on and hit either JBC or the front seat of the limo (no such damage to the front seat was found), the fact that the wound in JBC's thigh was sufficiently shallow as to allow a bullet like CE-399 to fall out, and the fact that neutron activation analysis proved that CE-399 wounded JBC's wrist.

When taken collectively, The Reasonable Man concludes from the above that, beyond any reasonable doubt, JFK and JBC were both wounded by CE-399.

[John Iacoletti]

All of which is a fancy way of saying “it’s not absolutely impossible that CE399 caused all those wounds, therefore it did”.

That’s rhetoric, not evidence.

[Tom Graves]

All of which is a fancy way of saying “it’s not absolutely impossible that CE399 caused all those wounds, therefore it did”.

That’s rhetoric, not evidence.

No, Iacoletti, that's just your "Oswald Public Defender" way of twisting it.

[John Iacoletti]

No, Iacoletti, that's just your "Oswald Public Defender" way of twisting it.

I asked you for evidence not “woulda, coulda, shoulda”.

[John Mytton]

The evidence that CE-399 wounded both JFK and JBC is comprised of the following: the fact that a bullet like CE-399 has a tendency to start tumbling upon exiting something soft (like a block of ballistics gel or a human neck), the fact that the entry wound in JBC's back measured 15mm x 6mm, the fact that both CE-399 and the largish bullet fragments found in the limo were ballistically traced to Oswald's short-rifle, the fact that the injuries sustained by JBC's wrist were commiserate with CE-399's penetrating it backwards and sideswiping his radial bone, the fact that the damage sustained by CE-399 was commiserate with the damage it did to JBC's rib and wrist, and the fact that JFK's and JBC's reactions (including JBC's hat flip, his jacket's billowing outwards, and his lapel's flapping outwards) in the Zapruder film were sufficiently close in time to lead The Reasonable Man (it's a legal  theory) to conclude that they had been wounded by the same bullet. All of these things taken collectively prove, beyond any reasonable doubt, that JFK and JBC were both wounded by CE-399.

Well said!

Geez, what are the chances that someone could produce a bullet that would match the injuries with such precision, missing a small amount of lead and flattened on only one side?



JohnM

[Tom Graves]

I asked you for evidence not “woulda, coulda, shoulda”.

I've got a feeling you would have given John Abt a real run for his rubles, Iacoletti.

[Royell Storing]

Well said!

Geez, what are the chances that someone could produce a bullet that would match the injuries with such precision, missing a small amount of lead and flattened on only one side?



JohnM

   And that same exact Ammo somehow EXPLODED JFK's Head on contact? Only in the Funny Papers.