A hole in Bledsoe's story?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A hole in Bledsoe's story?  (Read 62674 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: A hole in Bledsoe's story?
« Reply #147 on: March 21, 2025, 01:07:23 PM »
BS:
Who said the comment was related to the outline?
Who said it was any directive to go home?  It was a realization that the conclusion has already been drawn by Jan. 22, 1964.

Read the transcript.
https://jfk.boards.net/post/2185/thread


It was all filtered thru the FBI and the guy you just quoted is General counsel for the Commission.
Here he is telling you it was a "rubber stamp"

Rankin: "They found the man. There is nothing more to do. The Commission supports their conclusions, and we can go on home and that is the end of it."

Here is the outline the Commission was to follow as early as Jan. 11, 1964
https://ratical.org/ratville/JFK/PG/PGappA.html



You most certainly implied it when you wrote:

Here he is telling you it was a "rubber stamp.

And it was an obvious sarcastic remark regarding his suspicions (at that point in time and context) about the FBI. Regardless of what your opinion is, the Warren Commission did not rubber-stamp the FBI’s reports. They conducted their own independent investigation. I have already shown some supporting documentation and will provide more. And I will soon show you what Willens wrote regarding the outline.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: A hole in Bledsoe's story?
« Reply #148 on: March 21, 2025, 01:09:31 PM »
The person with the most influence on the Warren Commission and how it conducted its business was J. Edgar Hoover.

He most certainly influenced the WC. But not in the way you are implying. The reality is they did just the opposite of what JEH would have liked for them to do.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: A hole in Bledsoe's story?
« Reply #149 on: March 21, 2025, 01:18:19 PM »
Who said the lawyers prepared any chapter that early - it was an outline, distributed to the members by the Chief Justice - where would he get that from?
Whaetver you are calling an "independent investigation" was filtered thru the FBI.  All requests for evidence went thru the FBI.

Can I ask you something? When are you going to address this blatantly obvious quote?

Why would I address that quote, when I agree with you?

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: A hole in Bledsoe's story?
« Reply #150 on: March 21, 2025, 02:00:19 PM »
Who said the lawyers prepared any chapter that early - it was an outline, distributed to the members by the Chief Justice - where would he get that from?
Whaetver you are calling an "independent investigation" was filtered thru the FBI.  All requests for evidence went thru the FBI.

Can I ask you something? When are you going to address this blatantly obvious quote?


  All requests for evidence went thru the FBI.

That is an assumption on your part that is just plain wrong. I have already shown evidence to the contrary and will continue to do so.

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 778
Re: A hole in Bledsoe's story?
« Reply #151 on: March 21, 2025, 02:30:35 PM »

And it was an obvious sarcastic remark regarding his suspicions (at that point in time and context) about the FBI.

 BS: Lame excuse.
There is no sarcasm there whatsoever. It is a very serious discussion.
You choose to be ignorant. I have nothing else to add.

« Last Edit: March 21, 2025, 02:48:42 PM by Michael Capasse »

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 778
Re: A hole in Bledsoe's story?
« Reply #152 on: March 21, 2025, 02:31:21 PM »

  All requests for evidence went thru the FBI.

That is an assumption on your part that is just plain wrong. I have already shown evidence to the contrary and will continue to do so.

 BS:
You have nothing.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2025, 02:39:23 PM by Michael Capasse »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: A hole in Bledsoe's story?
« Reply #153 on: March 21, 2025, 03:20:12 PM »
BS: Lame excuse.
There is no sarcasm there whatsoever. It is a very serious discussion.
You choose to be ignorant. I have nothing else to add.

Let’s keep this a discussion about the Warren Commission. Ignorant about what exactly?