JFK Assassination Computer Analysis Video!

[Tom Sorensen]

Of all the kooky claims supporting a conspiracy, the "mysterious deaths" justification is among the most absurd.  Imagine the roving bands of death squads knocking people off left and right.  Sometimes years or even decades after the assassination.  Long after almost all of these people have told the authorities everything that they had to tell.  And the death squads add untold numbers of new conspirators to carry out these acts.  These people would then need to be silenced by someone else.  And on and on exponentially until there would be no one left to bury the dead.

A case of brain fog?

Long after almost all of these people have told the authorities everything that they had to tell.

There exists no evidence to support this claim.

And on and on exponentially until there would be no one left to bury the dead.

To set up a death squad to eliminate each member of a death squad ad infinitum is probably the most retarded idea I've seen a Lone Nutter come up with.

[Richard Smith]

A case of brain fog?

Long after almost all of these people have told the authorities everything that they had to tell.

There exists no evidence to support this claim.

And on and on exponentially until there would be no one left to bury the dead.

To set up a death squad to eliminate each member of a death squad ad infinitum is probably the most retarded idea I've seen a Lone Nutter come up with.

If you actually believed that rogue death squads were roaming the country committing murder after murder to cover up the conspiracy, and they were still at large, you would be a bit more reluctant to post that on a public forum.  This tells me that you don't really believe that nonsense.

[Richard Smith]

It was the computer model's main hypothesis; take it or leave it.  It's objectively pointing to a statistical anomaly. It's not based on subjectivity or opinion.
It will be interesting to see if anything of any importance comes to light when the last files are revealed... if they ever are!

I'll leave it.  Junk science is just that but if you believe that you have "objective" evidence that supports a conclusion that dozens or hundreds of people were killed as part of a conspiracy to assassinate the president, why are you wasting time on this forum instead of standing inside the Dallas PD or FBI HQ providing them with your evidence?  Why are you not taking this evidence to the NY Times and other media outlets?  If I believed that I had evidence that would lend itself to advancing a homicide investigation - much less hundreds including the assassination of the president - I would be making every effort to provide that evidence to the relevant authorities and/or media.

[Tom Sorensen]

If you actually believed that rogue death squads were roaming the country committing murder after murder to cover up the conspiracy, and they were still at large, you would be a bit more reluctant to post that on a public forum.  This tells me that you don't really believe that nonsense.

Regardless of what I believe, you came up with the replicating death squads, so why should I worry?

[Richard Smith]

Regardless of what I believe, you came up with the replicating death squads, so why should I worry?

They just silenced Clint Hill.  Maybe add him to the list.

[Tom Sorensen]

They just silenced Clint Hill.  Maybe add him to the list.

I don't keep a list, but nice try. To me, this looks more like chronic brain fog.

[Richard Smith]

Regardless of what I believe, you came up with the replicating death squads, so why should I worry?

Bugliosi has a short chapter in his book addressing the junk science and lunacy of the mysterious deaths hoax.  Again, though, if I were convinced that a death squad was at large killing dozens or hundreds of witnesses, I would be reluctant to point that out on a public forum that members of the death squad might be monitoring.  I would take that information to the authorities and let them deal with it.