If I Had Planned The Conspiracy ...

[John Iacoletti]

Asking questions is not only not bad but it's good. But at some point you have to accept the answers. This is all we have.

This is truly the heart of the LN position.  This is all we have, so it has to be good enough.  Even if our "answer" isn't very well supported, it's better than no answer.

[Tom Graves]

This is truly the heart of the LN position.  This is all we have, so it has to be good enough.  Even if our "answer" isn't very well supported, it's better than no answer.

Why don't you provide us with a plausible alternative scenario, Iacoletti?

[Tom Sorensen]

Why would an implausible scenario need a plausible alternative?

[Tom Graves]

Why would an implausible scenario need a plausible alternative?

Because the Warren Commission's "implausible scenario" is a lot less implausible than any of the anti-CIA / anti-FBI / anti-Military scenarios that you and the other tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists have been able to come up with over the past sixty years, especially given the fact that most if not all of your conspiracy theories require an implausibly large number of bad guys involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important cover up.

D'oh

[Tom Sorensen]

Because the Warren Commission's "implausible scenario" is a lot less implausible than any of the anti-CIA / anti-FBI / anti-Military scenarios that you and the other tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists have been able to come up with over the past sixty years, especially given the fact that all of your conspiracy theories require an implausibly large number of bad guys involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important cover up.

D'oh

The WC scenario is junk in it's own right, based on the available evidence. Junk is junk. It doesn't matter what other junk scenarios you can come up with, even if you believe they're worse, so your argument is simply false.

[Tom Graves]

The WC scenario is junk in it's own right, based on the available evidence. Junk is junk. It doesn't matter what other junk scenarios you can come up with, even if you believe they're worse, so your argument is simply false.

Admit it, you can't think of any anti-"Military Industrial Intelligence-Community Complex" JFKA scenarios that are simpler than the Lone Gunman scenario the Warren Commission uncovered.

[Tom Sorensen]

Admit it, you can't think of any anti-"Military Industrial Intelligence-Community Complex" JFKA scenarios that's simpler than the Lone Gunman scenario the Warren Commission uncovered.

Um, the LG scenario is inherently the simplest, so I would be wasting my time. The WC didn't uncover the LG scenario, that came from above. You didn't know that?