Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.

[Tom Graves]

How stinking far away from the window do you think the sitting box was? Hint, if you are going by Holland’s video, you are going to be way, way, way, off…

Just look at the official photos that were taken of the Sniper's Nest on 11/22/63, and you'll see what I'm talking about. The "sitting box" was too far away from the window (and at the wrong angle for the shots except, perhaps, for the final one) for Oswald to have sat on while shooting his three shots -- the first one of which was steeply-downward-angled because it was fired at hypothetical "Z-124," half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133 and before the limo disappeared from Oswald's view behind the foliage of the oak tree.

[Charles Collins]

Just look at the official photos that were taken of the Sniper's Nest on 11/22/63, and you'll see what I'm talking about. The "sitting box" was too far away from the window (and at the wrong angle for the shots except, perhaps, for the final one) for Oswald to have sat on while shooting his three shots -- the first one of which was steeply-downward-angled because it was fired at hypothetical "Z-124," half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133 and before the limo disappeared from Oswald's view behind the foliage of the oak tree.

I have already studied all of the dimensions as measured and documented by the investigators. Have you?

[Tom Graves]

I have already studied all of the dimensions as measured and documented by the investigators. Have you?

So did Max Holland.

[Tom Graves]

I have already studied all of the dimensions as measured and documented by the investigators. Have you?

Perhaps you can use your favorite uploader (or whatever it's called) and post some photos here of the "Sniper's Nest" showing just how close the "sitting box" was to a good shooting angle at the window.

[Royell Storing]

Thanks, but no thanks.

Just watch "The Lost Bullet."

   Your attempt at defending Holland is admirable but hopeless. Did you notice when they demonstrated how their ejected Hulls came very close to matching the 11/22/63 photos of the hulls on the floor, that "Holland's Hero" had Removed the scope from the rifle? Makes me think we were seeing Take 22. Holland is amusing, but for him to be granted a stage by National Geographic explains why this case remains unsolved after 60+ years. The Cover-Up is ongoing.   

[Tom Graves]

   Your attempt at defending Holland is admirable but hopeless. Did you notice when they demonstrated how their ejected Hulls came very close to matching the 11/22/63 photos of the hulls on the floor, that "Holland's Hero" had Removed the scope from the rifle? Makes me think we were seeing Take 22. Holland is amusing, but for him to be granted a stage by National Geographic explains why this case remains unsolved after 60+ years. The Cover-Up is ongoing.

How many bad guys do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the patsy-ing, the shooting, and the cover up?

A couple hundred?

Do you think a shell would bounce off the scope when ejected and that its flight would thereby be altered?

What would survey-based chalks marks approximately 10 feet away look like when viewed though the scope?

(That's what the "Oswald" actor was aiming at for the three different trajectories.)

If too blurry to be of any use, might that be reason they removed the scope?

[Tom Graves]

Your attempt at defending Holland is admirable but hopeless. Did you notice when they demonstrated how their ejected Hulls came very close to matching the 11/22/63 photos of the hulls on the floor, that "Holland's Hero" had Removed the scope from the rifle? Makes me think we were seeing Take 22. Holland is amusing, but for him to be granted a stage by National Geographic explains why this case remains unsolved after 60+ years. The Cover-Up is ongoing.

This guy has the same short-rifle and scope as Oswald's.

If you'll go to about the 11-minute mark, you can watch him fire, eject the spent shell, and rechamber a new round several times.

If you'll watch closely, you'll see that the ejected shells don't hit the scope.

So much for your "Ongoing Cover Up" theory.