Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.

[Tom Graves]

Do you believe that there was enough space available for a sniper to stand somewhere else besides where the box was positioned? If so, please show us exactly where that space was supposed to be.

It looks to me as though there was enough room for Oswald to either:

1) Stand and lean forward near your beloved seat box for his steeply-downward-angled 1st shot at hypothetical "Z-124," and then kneel down for his 2nd and 3rd shots, or

2) to sit rather uncomfortably on your beloved seat box (one bun on / one bun off) and shoot at Z-160 (LOL), at Z-222 -224, and, of course, at Z-313.


https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1317#relPageId=509

[Charles Collins]

It looks to me as though there was enough room for Oswald to either:

1) Stand and lean forward near your beloved seat box for his steeply-downward-angled 1st shot at hypothetical "Z-124," and then kneel down for his 2nd and 3rd shots, or

2) to sit rather uncomfortably on your beloved seat box (one bun on / one bun off) and shoot at Z-160 (LOL), at Z-222 -224, and, of course, at Z-313.


https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1317#relPageId=509

I doubt that there is enough room for that. And I suspect that is why Max didn’t include the seat box in his demonstration. This might be worth further study. I will have to decide later. But first I think that you need to know that the photo you chose, CE 1301, is a recreation that the DPD arranged two days after the assassination. And the recreation isn’t exactly accurate. The window boxes are noticeably further west than where they were located during the assassination. Correcting this error would definitely reduce the space available for standing/kneeling.

[Royell Storing]

The echoing of the three muzzle blasts and the three supersonic "cracks" created a cacophony of sound which fooled many witnesses into believing two of the three shots were close together.

  You mention, "cacophony of Sound which Fooled many witnesses.................". This same claim therefore applies to Zapruder and the "jiggles" on his Zapruder Film. It is those Z Film "jiggles" which are the foundation for assigning Z Frames to each of the 3 shots. It is also these "jiggles" which NOW foster a 10+ Second duration for all 3 shots being fired. You can Not, "have your cake and eat it too".

   

[Tom Graves]

I doubt that there is enough room for that. And I suspect that is why Max didn’t include the seat box in his demonstration. This might be worth further study. I will have to decide later. But first I think that you need to know that the photo you chose, CE 1301, is a recreation that the DPD arranged two days after the assassination. And the recreation isn’t exactly accurate. The window boxes are noticeably further west than where they were located during the assassination. Correcting this error would definitely reduce the space available for standing/kneeling.

FWIW, the corner of the tilted box is eight bricks over from the vertical wooden post.

https://www.jfk.org/collections-archive/photograph-of-spent-rifle-shells-found-on-the-floor-by-the-snipers-perch/

[Tom Graves]

I doubt that there is enough room for that. And I suspect that is why Max didn’t include the seat box in his demonstration. This might be worth further study. I will have to decide later. But first I think that you need to know that the photo you chose, CE 1301, is a recreation that the DPD arranged two days after the assassination. And the recreation isn’t exactly accurate. The window boxes are noticeably further west than where they were located during the assassination. Correcting this error would definitely reduce the space available for standing/kneeling.

Do you think the "Studebaker Exhibit J" photo is more accurate?

https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/07/did-police-fake-evidence.html

[Charles Collins]

Do you think the "Studebaker Exhibit J" photo is more accurate?

https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/07/did-police-fake-evidence.html

No, it looks like the same arrangement as CE1301 from a closer distance.

CE482 and CE715 and CE716 show portions of the window boxes before they were moved. Those let us gauge the distance they were positioned from the center post dividing the two windows.

[Tom Graves]

No, it looks like the same arrangement as CE1301 from a closer distance.

CE482 and CE715 and CE716 show portions of the window boxes before they were moved. Those let us gauge the distance they were positioned from the center post dividing the two windows.

I've already posted CE715.