Oswald took 10.2 seconds to fire all three shots.

[Tom Graves]

If anyone was full of high-fructose beans and you are right, it was those 80+ witnesses who flatulated the evidence of three shots, three hits, the first hitting JFK, the second hitting JBC in the back and third and last hitting JFK in the head. But you are the one who smelled it first, so.....

I haven't read many of your other garbage posts on this thread, so let me ask you -- do you think three shots were fired at JFK and that the first one hit him in the throat around Z-220, the second one hit JBC in the back a split-second later, and the third one hit JFK in the front of the head, the side of the head, or . . . gasp . . . the back of the head at Z-313?

If so, given the fact that three shells were found on the Sniper's Nest floor, how many bad guys do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important COVER UP?

Oodles and gobs?

[Andrew Mason]

I haven't read many of your other garbage posts on this thread, so let me ask you -- do you think three shots were fired at JFK and that the first one hit him in the throat around Z-220, the second one hit JBC in the back a split-second later, and the third one hit JFK in the front of the head, the side of the head, or . . . gasp . . . the back of the head at Z-313?

If so, given the fact that three shells were found on the Sniper's Nest floor, how many bad guys do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important COVER UP?

Oodles and gobs?

I think you should read my posts and stay away from the high fructose beans epithets.

[Tom Graves]

I think you should read my posts and stay away from the high-fructose beans epithets.

They aren't epithets.

They're descriptions.

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

I think you should read my posts and stay away from the high fructose beans epithets.

Oligosaccharides: Beans contain oligosaccharides (like raffinose and stachyose), which are complex sugars that the human body lacks the enzymes to break down. When these sugars reach the large intestine, they are fermented by gut bacteria, producing gas as a byproduct.5 May 2020

An oligosaccharide (/ˌɒlɪɡoʊˈsćkəˌraɪd/;[1] from Ancient Greek ὀλίγος (olígos) 'few' and σάκχαρ (sákkhar) 'sugar') is a saccharide polymer containing a small number (typically three to ten[2][3][4][5]) of monosaccharides (simple sugars). Oligosaccharides can have many functions including cell recognition and cell adhesion.[6]

They are normally present as glycans: oligosaccharide chains are linked to lipids or to compatible amino acid side chains in proteins, by N- or O-glycosidic bonds. N-Linked oligosaccharides are always pentasaccharides attached to asparagine via a beta linkage to the amine nitrogen of the side chain.[7] Alternately, O-linked oligosaccharides are generally attached to threonine or serine on the alcohol group of the side chain. Not all natural oligosaccharides occur as components of glycoproteins or glycolipids. Some, such as the raffinose series, occur as storage or transport carbohydrates in plants. Others, such as maltodextrins or cellodextrins, result from the microbial breakdown of larger polysaccharides such as starch or cellulose.

Fibre (eg raffinose) creates gas due to fermentation in the large intestine (in everyone).
Raffinose, that is a funny name. Raffi-nose. LOL.

Fructose can cause gas for very rare individuals that cannot digest fructose very well (in which case fermentation occurs in the large intestine)(producing gas).
Likewize lots of kinds of things can cause gas for individuals that have digestive issues (re that there thing) in the small intestine (resulting in fermentation in the large intestine).

Me myself i eat carnivore (animal based fats & proteins etc)(ie food)(real food).
Carnivores like myself know that beans etc (eg plant based starches & sugars)(& plant based oils)(& to some extent plant based proteins) are not real food (they are faux-food).

[Tom Graves]

Eighty-plus witnesses said they thought the first shot hit JFK, or that they had heard what they thought was firecracker explode a few seconds before JFK (and JBC) were hit by said "first shot."

How many bad guys do YOU figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important COVER UP?

Oodles and gobs?

[Andrew Mason]

How many bad guys do YOU figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important COVER UP?

Oodles and gobs?

You responded to my post in which I said there is less than zero evidence for an early missed shot and for a second shot SBT. Maybe you should have read it before responding.  Here is the last paragraph:

“ I would also say that there is less than zero evidence for the second shot SBT for the same reasons.  However, where we seem to disagree is whether there was more than one shooter.  I suggest that the evidence does not exclude all three shots, three hits and a single shooter: Oswald.  In fact, I suggest that the evidence as a whole compels such a conclusion.”

[Tom Graves]

You responded to my post in which I said there is less than zero evidence for an early missed shot and for a second shot SBT. Maybe you should have read it before responding.  Here is the last paragraph:

“ I would also say that there is less than zero evidence for the second shot SBT for the same reasons.  However, where we seem to disagree is whether there was more than one shooter.  I suggest that the evidence does not exclude all three shots, three hits and a single shooter: Oswald.  In fact, I suggest that the evidence as a whole compels such a conclusion.”

1) Do you think Oswald was the only shooter?

2) If so, do you think Oswald fired three shots?

3) If so, do you think JFK and JBC were hit by different bullets?

4) If so, in which Zapruder frame (approximately) was JFK hit, and in which frame (approximately) was JBC hit?

5) Thanks.