4K Zapruder film

[Steve Barber]

C'mon Royell, stop embarrassing yourself.
All the images from that day are in perfect synchronicity and so far you have failed dismally to prove otherwise.
And the fact that Willis 5 is blurry and we can still see one man standing partially in front of another proves your go nowhere theory is simply just another fragment of your imagination. Much like your previous observations of the missing Police antennae on the lead car at Parkland or your theory that in the Nix Film, Elm street went uphill! No offence or anything, but you seriously can't make up your level of pure incompetence.

Btw when are you going to explain all 3 men being visible in Moorman, Muchmore and Nix, and why nobody bothered to erase the third man from these images? On the other hand don't bother even trying because you have no answers!

JohnM

   Excellent response to Royell's total nonesense, as always, John.

   Exhibit A.  The man standing next to his wife in front of the park bench, is the man standing next to Emmett Hudson during the assassination on the stais on the knoll during the shooting.

   Exhibit B is the same man, at the upper portion of the stairs now,  turned, with his back to the camera, running for cover after witnessing the fatal shot.

   Exhibit A:      Exhibit B:
 
   

[Royell Storing]

   If you look at the Muchmore Footage, you can CLEARLY see the Stark Color Difference between this man's Long Sleeve Shirt/Sweater vs the WHITE undershirt he is wearing. There is absolutely No Confusing the stark contrast between the color of the long sleeve shirt vs the undershirt. None. To my eye, this man moving Up-The Steps on the Nix Film is wearing a WHITE Short Sleeve Shirt or a White Shirt with the sleeves rolled up. I see skin tone from roughly the mid arm area downward.
  The Nix Film CLEARLY shows a man in a TOTALLY WHITE SHIRT moving Up-The-Steps. 
  So now we have the Baseless Claim being made that this man in the Long Sleeve Shirt is also married and has a child? You're now "jumping the shark".
  I am not claiming this long sleeved man is missing from the Willis Photo. What is missing is Emmit Hudson and his WHITE PANT LEGS and the WHITE on the top of his head. None of any of this is visible in the Willis Photo. The 2 pant legs would be at roughly ground level and extending Upward roughly 3 feet. The WHITE on the top of his head would be roughly 6 feet above ground. That's a Lot of Brightly Colored Space to totally Vanish from the Willis Photo.
   And let's Not Forget that Hudson's WC Testimony DETAILS only 1 Man being with him on The Steps Before, During, and After the Assassination.   

[Dan O'meara]

C'mon Royell, stop embarrassing yourself.
All the images from that day are in perfect synchronicity and so far you have failed dismally to prove otherwise.
And the fact that Willis 5 is blurry and we can still see one man standing partially in front of another proves your go nowhere theory is simply just another fragment of your imagination. Much like your previous observations of the missing Police antennae on the lead car at Parkland or your theory that in the Nix Film, Elm street went uphill! No offence or anything, but you seriously can't make up your level of pure incompetence.

Btw when are you going to explain all 3 men being visible in Moorman, Muchmore and Nix, and why nobody bothered to erase the third man from these images? On the other hand don't bother even trying because you have no answers!

JohnM

or your theory that in the Nix Film, Elm street went uphill!

 
That is truly awesome.

[Royell Storing]

  I continue waiting for a Fact Based response to: (1) Seeing absolutely No Trace of Emmett Hudson on the Willis Photo, and/or (2) White Shirt Man moving Up-The-Steps on the Nix Film. Telling the viewer to use "logic" or "common sense" vs what they actually See, (or do Not see), in the Willis Photo vs The Muchmore Film, vs The Nix Film reveals a serious problem between these contrasting images. The images on ALL 3 can Not be true. It's no mystery why Hudson is the only person that Law Enforcement ID'd. Hudson did maintenance work on the Dealey Plaza grounds. It would have been only a matter of time until Hudson's identity along with his story of Only 1 Man being on The Steps with him became known.     

[John Mytton]

or your theory that in the Nix Film, Elm street went uphill!

 
That is truly awesome.

Yeah, Royell couldn't understand that Nix's camera was being held with a slight rotation and insisted that the Nix film was yet another set of altered images, because as he says, Elm street was going uphill away from the depository!? But when I pointed out the obvious fact that the light pole was also off kilter, he suddenly or hopefully saw the light and then happily went hunting for another Royell sized anomaly.



JohnM

[Royell Storing]

    Still waiting for Anyone on this Forum to supply Evidence that explains the obvious ambiguity between what we see on the Willis Photo vs The Muchmore Film.  Hudson was wearing Long White Pants. The Bright White on the top of Hudson's head was also highly visible. Where is even a trace of any of this on the Willis Photo? And then we have the White Shirt Man moving Up-The-Steps. You guys keep telling us that the "images do Not lie" Yet, now you go crickets.
     I already Proved that Officer Haygood is NOT the motorcycle cop back inside the train yard on the Darnell/Martin Films. And I have also exposed the White Shirt Man on the Nix Film. I am currently wrapping up yet another Discovery. Those of you claiming to be JFK Assassination Researchers should apologize for your dereliction of duty.     

[John Mytton]

And I have also exposed the White Shirt Man on the Nix Film.   

Sorry Royell, but the man seen running up the steps in a good quality Nix film frame grab is wearing a brown shirt.
And your looking at a poor multigenerational, heavily compressed YouTube video isn't evidence of anything. LOL!



BTW your track record is littered with provable hallucinations and bizarre nonsense, do you honestly think that you are a believable JFK Assassination Researcher or are you just a fraudulent observer with delusions of grandeur?

JohnM