4K Zapruder film

[John Mytton]

@ John Mytton, the black male on the steps with Emmet Hudson and the other guy, he runs up the steps, right. From frames 410 onwards, why isn't he seen anywhere in the Z-film? when clearly by this time he made it to the top of the steps into knoll/wall area?

There's no obvious evidence of his breakneck speed effort to get up the steps.

Hi Robert, that's an interesting question, let's examine the facts.

1. Zapruder's camera was set up at the camera's zoomed in position.

2. From Zapruder's perspective he panned to the Fort Worth Turnpike sign about 6 seconds after the head shot and subsequently about 6 seconds after the black man turned and started moving up the steps.





3. From Zapruder's perspective the Fort Worth sign was not far off the line of sight as the initial position of the three men.



4. By the time Zapruder got to the fence area, the time was about 7 seconds since the black man turned and hurried up the steps.



Therefore the black man was long gone by the time Zapruder was in a position to film the black man!

JohnM

[John Mytton]

  There is a small sign attached to the light pole (E) of the 2 GUYS standing on The Steps. There is NOT 3 GUYS standing on The Steps. Hudson wore WHITE PANTS that day. The 2 Guys we see on the Willis Photo are wearing Very DARK Pants. Where do we see any trace of Hudson's Bright WHITE PANTS on the Willis Photo YOU Posted? The Hudson WHITE PANTS should be a stark contrast vs the Dark Pants of the 2 Guys standing near him. The White Pants vs Dark Pants contrast is VIVID on the Film snippet you posted. You have defeated your 3 Guys claim.

1) The three men are clearly visible in Moorman's photo which BTW was on the UPI network on the very next day.



2) The three men are clearly visible in Muchmore's film.



3) The three men are clearly visible in Nix's film.





Why Royell why, would "they" remove the third man from a blurry relatively obscure photo?? Please explain why "they" wouldn't remove this third man from ALL the imagery??



JohnM

[Royell Storing]

    Thanks for posting that GHOST IMAGE. Does anyone on this Forum really see 2 Heads in close proximity to each other on the posted Willis Photo? Does anyone on this Forum really see the Flesh Tones from 2 different Faces in close proximity to each other on the posted Willis Photo? Of course not! And where oh where is the WHITE COLOR from the Hudson pant legs, or the WHITE COLORING atop his head? NONE of any of this is visible on the Willis Photo because a 3rd Person is Not There. 

[Royell Storing]

   These Assassination Images clearly contradict each other. Conjuring up "Ghost Images" does Not explain this blatant contradiction. 

[Duncan MacRae]

And where oh where is the WHITE COLOR from the Hudson pant legs, or the WHITE COLORING atop his head? NONE of any of this is visible on the Willis Photo because a 3rd Person is Not There.

Logic and the use of common sense should tell you, and anyone else with a logically functioning Brain, that the Whitening of the Pants is for Illustrative Purposes Only, ie, for those People like yourself, No Insult Intended  whose Eyesight is clearly not very good for the analysis and detection of the logical content contained in less than perfectly clear unaltered Images.

[Royell Storing]

  Oh I get it. Do NOT believe what you actually see in these 2 images. Instead, employ some kind of "logic" to explain away how 2 people can somehow become 3 people in a matter of seconds. We consistently have people on this Forum swearing by the "images". They lecture us that photos and films "do not lie". That JFK Assassination photos and films are FACT. Now, when we have 2 JFK Assassination images that clearly contradict each other, we Now are getting a, "these are Not the droids you're looking for" dismissal. Basically, we are Now being told to ignore what we are seeing and use a "Mind Over Matter" approach. Well, we fully realize that we have the droids right in front of us, and we will Not be diverted by a wave of Obi-Wan Kenobi's hand. 

[John Mytton]

   These Assassination Images clearly contradict each other. Conjuring up "Ghost Images" does Not explain this blatant contradiction.

C'mon Royell, stop embarrassing yourself.
All the images from that day are in perfect synchronicity and so far you have failed dismally to prove otherwise.
And the fact that Willis 5 is blurry and we can still see one man standing partially in front of another proves your go nowhere theory is simply just another fragment of your imagination. Much like your previous observations of the missing Police antennae on the lead car at Parkland or your theory that in the Nix Film, Elm street went uphill! No offence or anything, but you seriously can't make up your level of pure incompetence.

Btw when are you going to explain all 3 men being visible in Moorman, Muchmore and Nix, and why nobody bothered to erase the third man from these images? On the other hand don't bother even trying because you have no answers!

JohnM