That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge  (Read 48219 times)

Online John Corbett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
   "Hold any water"? Why do you think the Officer Haygood making a 2nd trip into the railroad yard was suddenly cooked up after 62+ years? It is in response to my have attached a rock solid 12:38 PM Timeline to the Darnell still frame showing Officer Harkness, + Buddy Walthers, + The Alleged Officer Haygood. I have been banging away at the "That Ain't Haygood" issue for 2 yrs now. My recent discoveries of the documented Officer Harkness 12:36 radio transmission, and Inspector Sawyer NOT arriving at the TSBD until 12:35 PM, are the straws that broke this camel's back. "That Ain't Haygood" = Conspiracy has 'em scrambling.

In 35 years of dealing with conspiracy hobbyists, your the first one who I've ever come across who even made an issue about Haygood. What reason would anyone else have had to cook up an explanation for Haygood's movements. You are a cult of one with your fixation about this. Nobody else cares. And nobody else ever will.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4982
In 35 years of dealing with conspiracy hobbyists, your the first one who I've ever come across who even made an issue about Haygood. What reason would anyone else have had to cook up an explanation for Haygood's movements. You are a cult of one with your fixation about this. Nobody else cares. And nobody else ever will.

   You just saw how important, "That Ain't Haygood", is with the baseless claim now being made that Haygood made a 2nd trip into the railroad yard and that 2nd trip is what Darnell filmed. And you also fail to comprehend the ramifications of an Unknown Motorcycle Cop roaming across the railroad yard immediately after the kill shot.  The entirely baseless claim of Haygood making a 2nd trip into the railroad yard is indicative of a Defcon 1 setting. LN's understand that the fact proven "That Ain't Haygood" discovery is seismic. 

Online John Corbett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
   You just saw how important, "That Ain't Haygood",

Because you say so.

Quote
is with the baseless claim now being made that Haygood made a 2nd trip into the railroad yard and that 2nd trip is what Darnell filmed.

You take the silly position that if we can't prove the officer in the Darnell film is Haygood, then it couldn't have been Haygood. If there is no proof who the officer is in the Darnell film, then it is illogical to conclude that it is not Haygood. Your "evidence" is that Haygood is seen earlier with two gloves on and the officer in the Darnell film only has one glove on. As if that establishes it could not be Haygood. As if Haygood would have had no reason to take one of his gloves off. If you are going to demand we prove why Haygood would have taken a glove off, don't you need a reason for the officer in the Darnell film to have taken one of his gloves off? Why does one need proof and not the other?

Quote
And you also fail to comprehend the ramifications of an Unknown Motorcycle Cop roaming across the railroad yard immediately after the kill shot.  The entirely baseless claim of Haygood making a 2nd trip into the railroad yard is indicative of a Defcon 1 setting. LN's understand that the fact proven "That Ain't Haygood" discovery is seismic.

You have proven nothing but your own inability to understand what constitutes proof. You have not proven that officer is not Haygood. At best, you have established that the officer's identity is an open question which means it might or might not be Haygood. Even if it is not Haygood, it just means that some other unidentified cop went into the rail yard. That is a long way from being proof of a conspiracy, but since you have no real evidence of a conspiracy, you latch on to nonsense such as this.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4982

  You are going ostrich and ignoring the solid timelines of Officer Harkness and Buddy Walthers. Both of which Darnell filmed with this "Unknown Motorcycle Cop".
 The LN's understand the conspiracy ramifications of my fact based work. Hence, the totally unfounded claim of Haygood going deep into the railroad yard for a 2nd time. I have never seen anything so absurdly knee-jerk outta them. But, this is what you get with a ground breaking fact based discovery. "That Ain't Haygood" is rippling through the LN Community as we speak. And the conspiracy crowd is also now involved. Just so you ostrich's know. 

Online John Corbett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
  You are going ostrich and ignoring the solid timelines of Officer Harkness and Buddy Walthers. Both of which Darnell filmed with this "Unknown Motorcycle Cop".
 The LN's understand the conspiracy ramifications of my fact based work. Hence, the totally unfounded claim of Haygood going deep into the railroad yard for a 2nd time. I have never seen anything so absurdly knee-jerk outta them. But, this is what you get with a ground breaking fact based discovery. "That Ain't Haygood" is rippling through the LN Community as we speak. And the conspiracy crowd is also now involved. Just so you ostrich's know.

Your whole premise is base on the ridiculous assumption that "Unknown Motorcycle Cop" has to be an imposter. You arbitrarily dismiss the far more likely explanations that the cop could be Haygood after taking one of his gloves off or that it could be a different unidentified DPD cop. That is a completely illogical assumption. You have no evidence the cop is an impostor. It is an argument you have pulled out of thin air.

Have you ever bothered to ask yourself one simple question? What reason would the conspirators have had for putting an impostor cop in the railroad yard behind the GK. What could he have possibly been doing that would have aided the conspiracy in any way? What evidence do you have that he did what you imagined he was put there for? I eagerly await your answers to these questions.

Offline Steve Barber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
This image of Haygood shows the length of his glove.  Note the skin where the glove ends at the wrist:


https://ibb.co/0jYVYjBj

 This image shows Haygood carrying his glove.  Note that the front end of the glove he is carrying is not "blunt":

 https://ibb.co/TM73dkBw
« Last Edit: Today at 05:18:41 PM by Steve Barber »

Offline Tommy Shanks

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
This image of Haygood shows the length of his glove.  Note the skin where the glove ends at the wrist:


https://ibb.co/0jYVYjBj

Steve, can you offer any further opinion on Royell Storing's imposter Officer Haygood theory, as well as his claim that a "getaway" car was parked illegally in Dealey Plaza for hours after the shooting?

Offline Steve Barber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
Steve, can you offer any further opinion on Royell Storing's imposter Officer Haygood theory, as well as his claim that a "getaway" car was parked illegally in Dealey Plaza for hours after the shooting?

 Hi Tommy,

  I saw that thread and decided to ignore it. To me it's too subjective.

  I believe it's Haygood, and that there's no proof that he is walking to the TSBD instead of walking back to his parked motorcycle on Elm Street.  He is walking straight ahead, toward the pergola as seen in the Darnell footage, and most likely walked between the pergola and the stockade fence then took the steps down to his motorcycle on the street.
« Last Edit: Today at 05:10:23 PM by Steve Barber »