That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge

[Royell Storing]

For starters, between points #1 & #2, you have Officer Haygood running straight through the Ft Worth sign.

 
You funny.

The No Glove Cop does Not WALK toward the Pergola. Take the time and closely examine the Darnell/Martin Films. Through my research, I have untangled Officer Haygood's entire journey and how he was able to back at his motorcycle make his 12:35 radio transmission.

Point#4 is where Haygood is filmed in Darnell walking towards the TSBD building. You don't have a clue what he does after this point.
If Haygood is to get back to his bike in time to make his radio call then this is an approximation of the route he took. We know after he is filmed in Darnell, Haygood is back at his bike making his 12:35pm radio call.

And you've untangled Haygood's entire journey??
I've yet to hear this.
Please explain his full journey from the time he gets off his bike to the time he makes his radio call, and the evidence this timeline is based on?
As I understand it you have Haygood at the Triple Underpass for at least 4 minutes (12:34pm). How does he get round the railroad yard and back to his bike for his 12:35pm radio call

   Have you viewed the NEW DARNELL FILM SNIPPET? In this snippet, the "No Glove Cop" is walking even further toward/down the Elm St Ext.
   That same NEW Darnell snippet shows the Elm St Ext is NOW jammed with people. There is no way that Officer Harkness could drive his 3 wheel motorcycle down that street at this point in time.
   That "No Glove Cop" is being filmed at around 12:38. At 12:35 Officer Haygood was already back at his motorcycle and making his documented police radio transmission. That motorcycle cop ain't Haygood.

[Steve Barber]

   The Cabluck Photo shows Officer Haygood standing on a section of concrete below the wooden fencing. Use the "Photo Gallery" posted here to look at it.
   Officer Haygood gave Warren Commission testimony that after entering the railroad yard, he saw a man he "presumed" to be a railroad detective. Haygood said nothing about talking with the cop posted on the North East of the overpass.
    The Motorcycle Cop we see inside the railroad yard on the Darnell/Martin Films is NOT OFFICER HAYGOOD. The timelines of Officer Haygood and Officer Harkness make it impossible for the 2 of them to be filmed back there before 12:35. 12:35 is when Officer Haygood made a documented police radio transmission from his motorcycle parked at the Elm St Curb.

 I circled a three wheel motorcycle on the right side of a frame from the Darnell film, and the officer with one glove off is walking toward it.  Could it be that Haygood made the transmission he made at 12:35 from the circled 3-wheel motorcycle which he's walking towards? 

[Royell Storing]

 I circled a three wheel motorcycle on the right side of a frame from the Darnell film, and the officer with one glove off is walking toward it.  Could it be that Haygood made the transmission he made at 12:35 from the circled 3-wheel motorcycle which he's walking towards? 

  Thanks for posting that still frame from the Darnell snippet. When an officer makes a call from his motorcycle, that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached to the transcript of that radio transmission. That number is not the result of a possible "verbal" number being given. During his WC testimony, Officer Haygood verified both his number and his having made the 12:35 radio transmission.
   With this same Darnell snippet showing the Elm St Ext to be jammed with people, means we are seeing this "No Glove Cop" at around 12:38. This is well after Officer Haygood made his documented 12:35 police radio transmission from his motorcycle parked at the Elm St curb near the Triple Underpass. The "No Glove Cop" we see on the Darnell Film is NOT Officer Haygood.     

[Steve Barber]

  Thanks for posting that still frame from the Darnell snippet. When an officer makes a call from his motorcycle, that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached to the transcript of that radio transmission. That number is not the result of a possible "verbal" number being given. During his WC testimony, Officer Haygood verified both his number and his having made the 12:35 radio transmission.
   With this same Darnell snippet showing the Elm St Ext to be jammed with people, means we are seeing this "No Glove Cop" at around 12:38. This is well after Officer Haygood made his documented 12:35 police radio transmission from his motorcycle parked at the Elm St curb near the Triple Underpass. The "No Glove Cop" we see on the Darnell Film is NOT Officer Haygood.   

 ' "When an officer makes a call from his motorcycle, that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached to the transcript of that radio transmission. That number is not the result of a possible "verbal" number being given." ' 

 Can you clarify this for me?

 My question is:  How does a number from an officer's transmission over the radio become a "transcript", unless someone transcribes the recording-like Bowles did for the WC?  This doesn't have anything to do with the radio he is using.  Officers have a call# they use, and they give that number to the dispatcher.  So what number are you referring to?    My point is, is that Haygood is walking towards the parked 3 wheeler seen in the Darnell film ( I know you don't believe it's Haygood, but I do), and he could have easily used the 3 wheeler's radio to make his 12:35 transmission to dispatch. 

[Mitch Todd]

  Thanks for posting that still frame from the Darnell snippet. When an officer makes a call from his motorcycle, that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached to the transcript of that radio transmission. That number is not the result of a possible "verbal" number being given. During his WC testimony, Officer Haygood verified both his number and his having made the 12:35 radio transmission.
   With this same Darnell snippet showing the Elm St Ext to be jammed with people, means we are seeing this "No Glove Cop" at around 12:38. This is well after Officer Haygood made his documented 12:35 police radio transmission from his motorcycle parked at the Elm St curb near the Triple Underpass. The "No Glove Cop" we see on the Darnell Film is NOT Officer Haygood.   

RS: When an officer makes a call from his motorcycle, that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached to the transcript of that radio transmission. That number is not the result of a possible "verbal" number being given

This is simply not true. None of it. Harkness was unit 260 that day, but the Martin film shows that he was riding three-wheeler 99. Tippit was unit 78, but with driving car 10. In the DPD radio recordings, it's obvious that the transmitting officer's mouth is the generating the unit number, which is then repeated  by the (human) transcriptionist.  In 1963, the technology didn't exist to to automatically stamp the vehicle number on the transmission or the recording in any practical way.

[Royell Storing]

RS: When an officer makes a call from his motorcycle, that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached to the transcript of that radio transmission. That number is not the result of a possible "verbal" number being given

This is simply not true. None of it. Harkness was unit 260 that day, but the Martin film shows that he was riding three-wheeler 99. Tippit was unit 78, but with driving car 10. In the DPD radio recordings, it's obvious that the transmitting officer's mouth is the generating the unit number, which is then repeated  by the (human) transcriptionist.  In 1963, the technology didn't exist to to automatically stamp the vehicle number on the transmission or the recording in any practical way.

   Who said anything about a "vehicle number"?

[Royell Storing]

' "When an officer makes a call from his motorcycle, that specific motorcycle has a number that is then automatically attached to the transcript of that radio transmission. That number is not the result of a possible "verbal" number being given." ' 

 Can you clarify this for me?

 My question is:  How does a number from an officer's transmission over the radio become a "transcript", unless someone transcribes the recording-like Bowles did for the WC?  This doesn't have anything to do with the radio he is using.  Officers have a call# they use, and they give that number to the dispatcher.  So what number are you referring to?    My point is, is that Haygood is walking towards the parked 3 wheeler seen in the Darnell film ( I know you don't believe it's Haygood, but I do), and he could have easily used the 3 wheeler's radio to make his 12:35 transmission to dispatch.

      So if Haygood made his 12:35 radio transmission from the Harkness 3 wheel motorcycle, How does Harkness somehow find Euins, interview him, and then make his 12:36 radio transmission from the very same motorcycle? Tick/Tock/Tick/Tock.
     On top of that, this above chronological order does Not fit the Harkness WC Testimony. Harkness testified that he initially rode down Main St, checked around on the other side of the Triple Underpass, eventually went back to the TSBD, found Euins in the railroad yard, made his 12:36 radio transmission, took Euins to the front of the TSBD, loaded Euins into Inspector Sawyer's car, and then went and secured the back of the TSBD. This is where we see Harkness with the "No Glove Cop". And your claim is that Haygood used the Harkness motorcycle radio at 12:35 AFTER he had done all of this? Oh, and Inspector Sawyer arrived at the TSBD at 12:35. How is Euins already sitting in the back of Sawyer's car when Officer Haygood is allegedly making a 12:35 radio call from the Harkness motorcycle? This just does Not work 5 ways to Sunday. 
     Rather than going back-n-forth about how cop's calls were ID'd, I would ask that you look at the WC QA's of Haygood, Harkness, and Inspector Sawyer. It will be clear how this was done
     This Darnell snippet is very important as it also shows how crowded the Elm St Extension was when we see this "One Glove Cop" and Officer Harkness together, vs the Elm St Ext being empty when Harkness and Euins sped down it and then when Euins was sitting inside Inspector Sawyer's car. And all of this was after Harkness made his 12:36 radio transmission. What we are seeing when "One Glove Cop" and Harkness are together is happening around 12:38. Well after Officer Haygood's 12:35 radio transmission.
     I know how skeptics want to try and somehow get around ALL of this evidence, but it is clear. The "No Glove Cop" is not Officer Haygood. The real question is, who is this guy?