How did Oswald get the job at the TSBD

[Colin Crow]

Weidmann tries the exact same trick in some sort of bizarre attempt to appear neutral, why do you people bother?



JohnM

You do know that there are about as many "neutrals" as those that believe Oswald acted alone.....dont you?

[Wesley Johnson]

"Wes the buff" is here for games. It is clear by now that he is incapable of citing any evidence to support his claims.

"Me thinks you doth protest too much mister." You know what evidence Rob and every one on here knows. It is the same evidence that you seem obsessed with discrediting. Your only tactic along, with the other people on here, that are not even secure enough to say they believe a conspiracy, is to wait until someone that believes Oswald acted alone states the evidence and then you try to dispute it. That is weak. Instead, let's just say I believe you. Now what? Why don't you give me an alternative narrative of what you say happened. 

[Wesley Johnson]

You do know that there are about as many "neutrals" as those that believe Oswald acted alone.....dont you?

That would be more believable Colin if your "neutrals" would question the false statements made by "buffs". It is easy and safe, you see, to just say, "I question the evidence against Oswald. But I never said I believe in a conspiracy." That's weak.

[Wesley Johnson]

I sometimes wonder if Wesley actually knows the difference between his beloved evidence and actual proof.

Can you name some of that "actual proof" Martin? 

[Martin Weidmann]

Can you name some of that "actual proof" Martin? 

You want others to do your work for you, again?

[Wesley Johnson]

You want others to do your work for you, again?

Martin, you are being hypocritical again. It is no different than you asking me to cite evidence that you know exists. What's good for you is for me. So, can you cite some of that "actual proof?" I'll be waiting a long time.

[Martin Weidmann]

Martin, you are being hypocritical again. It is no different than you asking me to cite evidence that you know exists. What's good for you is for me. So, can you cite some of that "actual proof?" I'll be waiting a long time.

I'll be waiting a long time.

That's true for sure.

You seem to mistakenly believe that something that is presented as evidence is automatically proof of something.

No wonder why you believe what you believe.

Oh and btw.. you never ever cite any evidence whatsoever. All you do is make claims without backing then up.