JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
How did Oswald get the job at the TSBD
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Wesley Johnson on March 14, 2018, 05:25:52 PM ---
Very simple Martin. I believe the photo shows Oswald was in possession of a rifle and revolver. The original thread was how he got the job. So, do you believe how I stated he got the job at the TSBD. And if you are going to try and say the photo was faked you will have a hard time. That photo has been tested every way possible and found to be authentic. Your turn. ;D
--- End quote ---
I believe the photo shows Oswald was in possession of a rifle and revolver.
Fine... but did he own those weapons or was he just holding them?
The original thread was how he got the job. So, do you believe how I stated he got the job at the TSBD.
Most threads do not stay on topic. I have already answered your question and I am not in the habit of repeating myself.
And if you are going to try and say the photo was faked you will have a hard time.
I am on record as saying that I believe the BY photos are most likely authentic, although I do have my doubts about who really took them and for what purpose.
That photo has been tested every way possible and found to be authentic.
No it hasn't.
Tim Nickerson:
--- Quote from: Wesley Johnson on March 14, 2018, 05:25:52 PM ---
Very simple Martin. I believe the photo shows Oswald was in possession of a rifle and revolver.
--- End quote ---
Not just a rifle. It was the rifle.
(239) In the Lee Harvey Oswald backyard photographs identified as 133A Stovall,133A de Mohrenschildt, and CE-134, that same gouge is quite visible and can be measured and compared with the gouge on the questioned rifle . They are identical in every respect.
(240) Based upon this system of identification, the rifle in these photographs can be positively identified as the same rifle that is presently in the custody of the National Archives . Finally, it should be noted that although an FBI expert declined to make a positive identification of the rifle in question based upon this gouge mark, this expert did not have access to all of the same quality photographic prints that were available to the Panel. For example, the 133A de Mohrenschildt and 133A Stovall prints, both of which are of high quality, were obtained and reviewed by the committee in 1977 and 1978 respectively. This was the first time that these materials were analyzed . In addition, positive identification of the rifle was based upon an examination of CE-134, a very good enlargement (from the original negative) of CE-133A.* The FBI's expert in 1964, however, apparently did not consider this photograph in reaching his conclusion .
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/infojfk/jfk6/assass.htm
Wesley Johnson:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on March 14, 2018, 05:39:48 PM ---I believe the photo shows Oswald was in possession of a rifle and revolver.
Fine... but did he own those weapons or was he just holding them?
The original thread was how he got the job. So, do you believe how I stated he got the job at the TSBD.
Most threads do not stay on topic. I have already answered your question and I am not in the habit of repeating myself.
And if you are going to try and say the photo was faked you will have a hard time.
I am on record as saying that I believe the BY photos are most likely authentic, although I do have my doubts about who really took them and for what purpose.
That photo has been tested every way possible and found to be authentic.
No it hasn't.
--- End quote ---
Yes it has. No, the photo does not show ownership, but with the documentation linking it to Oswald it is damning evidence for sure. If you don't believe the photo has been tested explain.
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Wesley Johnson on March 14, 2018, 05:50:51 PM ---
Yes it has. No, the photo does not show ownership, but with the documentation linking it to Oswald it is damning evidence for sure. If you don't believe the photo has been tested explain.
--- End quote ---
Oh, I know the photo has been tested. I just don't agree with your over exaggerated claim that it was "found to be authentic"
the documentation linking it to Oswald
What documentation is linking what to Oswald?
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on March 14, 2018, 05:50:25 PM ---Not just a rifle. It was the rifle.
(239) In the Lee Harvey Oswald backyard photographs identified as 133A Stovall,133A de Mohrenschildt, and CE-134, that same gouge is quite visible and can be measured and compared with the gouge on the questioned rifle . They are identical in every respect.
(240) Based upon this system of identification, the rifle in these photographs can be positively identified as the same rifle that is presently in the custody of the National Archives . Finally, it should be noted that although an FBI expert declined to make a positive identification of the rifle in question based upon this gouge mark, this expert did not have access to all of the same quality photographic prints that were available to the Panel. For example, the 133A de Mohrenschildt and 133A Stovall prints, both of which are of high quality, were obtained and reviewed by the committee in 1977 and 1978 respectively. This was the first time that these materials were analyzed . In addition, positive identification of the rifle was based upon an examination of CE-134, a very good enlargement (from the original negative) of CE-133A.* The FBI's expert in 1964, however, apparently did not consider this photograph in reaching his conclusion .
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/infojfk/jfk6/assass.htm
--- End quote ---
So, the experts don't agree.... Go figure!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version