JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
How did Oswald get the job at the TSBD
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Wesley Johnson on March 12, 2018, 09:01:31 PM ---
Martin you seem to not want to come to grips that it looks pretty bad for Oswald.
"There isn't a single piece of physical evidence that isn't tainted in one way or another."
Okay, are you saying Oswald did not own a rifle (the rifle was linked to Oswald you say it's tainted how)? I have thought all of this through very carefully. Marina confirmed by her statements that Lee owned a rifle and that she took the photo of him holding it. Do you call her a liar? Give me one instance that supports there were people manipulating Oswald to frame him. Got anything? Can you name any piece of physical evidence to support a conspiracy theory?
--- End quote ---
Martin you seem to not want to come to grips that it looks pretty bad for Oswald.
What looks bad for Oswald? The official narrative? Of course it does, at least on a superficial level. But IMO that's what it was made for. The bigger question should be if the narrative is truthful and conclusive upon closer inspection, and I don't think it is. Way too many loose ends and unanswered questions....
Okay, are you saying Oswald did not own a rifle (the rifle was linked to Oswald you say it's tainted how)?
I don't know if he owned a rifle or not. I find the Klein's paperwork not credible enough to support the conclusion that Oswald owned a rifle, but that does not preclude that he might have had a rifle at some point in time.
Marina confirmed by her statements that Lee owned a rifle and that she took the photo of him holding it. Do you call her a liar?
I don't have to call Marina a liar. She confirmed herself that she had lied to investigators. That should have been a red flag, but somehow it wasn't. They probably needed her testimony too desperately to care.
Marina did confirm that she took the photo(s), but even if we disregard that she did not know how the camera worked and got the numbers of photos she took wrong as well, what does a photo taken of Oswald holding a rifle in late March 1963 prove to you? I was once photographed holding a rifle... Do you think that means I owned that weapon?
Give me one instance that supports there were people manipulating Oswald to frame him. Got anything? Can you name any piece of physical evidence to support a conspiracy theory?
There you go again with the loaded questions. There are some pieces of physical evidence (and the handling of them) that give me cause to wonder, but whether they sufficiently support a conspiracy theory is another matter.
Wesley Johnson:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on March 12, 2018, 09:28:11 PM ---Martin you seem to not want to come to grips that it looks pretty bad for Oswald.
What looks bad for Oswald? The official narrative? Of course it does, at least on a superficial level. But IMO that's what it was made for. The bigger question should be if the narrative truthful and conclusive upon closer inspection, and I don't think it is. Way too many loose ends and unanswered questions....
Okay, are you saying Oswald did not own a rifle (the rifle was linked to Oswald you say it's tainted how)?
I don't know if he owned a rifle or not. I find the Klein's paperwork not credible enough to support the conclusion that Oswald owned a rifle, but that does not preclude that he might have had a rifle at some point in time.
Marina confirmed by her statements that Lee owned a rifle and that she took the photo of him holding it. Do you call her a liar?
I don't have to call Marina a liar. She confirmed herself that she had lied to investigators. That should have been a red flag, but somehow it wasn't. They probably needed her testimony too desperately to care.
Marina did confirm that she took the photo(s), but even if we disregard that she did not know how the camera worked and got the numbers of photos she took wrong as well, what does a photo taken of Oswald holding a rifle in late March 1963 prove to you?
Give me one instance that supports there were people manipulating Oswald to frame him. Got anything? Can you name any piece of physical evidence to support a conspiracy theory?
There you go again with the loaded questions. There are some pieces of physical evidence (and the handling of them) that give me cause to wonder, but whether they sufficiently support a conspiracy theory is another matter.
--- End quote ---
Okay Martin just keep questioning every little piece of evidence. As for the photo it shows Oswald had a rifle and revolver.
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Wesley Johnson on March 12, 2018, 09:42:38 PM ---Okay Martin just keep questioning every little piece of evidence. As for the photo it shows Oswald had a rifle and revolver.
--- End quote ---
just keep questioning every little piece of evidence.
Is it your position that evidence, no matter how small, should not be examined and questioned?
As for the photo it shows Oswald had a rifle and revolver.
I was once photographed with a rifle. Do you think that means I owned that rifle?
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: Colin Crow on March 12, 2018, 12:29:01 AM ---The assassination took place at workplaces of the assassin. The decision to assassinate Lincoln at the Ford theatre only occurred hours before the assassination. It was a conspiracy.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote ---The assassination took place at workplaces of the assassin.
--- End quote ---
So Lee Oswald assassinated President Kennedy from his workplace?
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on March 12, 2018, 01:03:13 AM ---A rifle?
A rifle?
JohnM
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version