Ford's Editing Backed 'Single Bullet' Theory

[Bill Chapman]

Sure, Bill, sure. There's a thing in anatomy called the nape:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nape

The very first line at the above says the back of the neck.

Now if you want to argue and disagree over thousands of medical professionals who call that area the nape - that loose fold of skin that everyone has - vs a politician who was trying to further a square peg into a round hole - then you go right ahead. And you know, it's the same politician who pardoned one of the most corrupt US presidents in US history rather than let him face the consequences.

But it sure looks to me like that bullet hole is well below the nape, also known as the back of the neck.

But that's OK Bill. Let that old Kennedy bias hate creep in, blinding you to what's obvious to many more unbiased eyes.

LOL

BTW, you sound exactly like a certain 'Eddie Haymaker' who posted here a few months back, 'Michael'.

My 'Junction City' back/neck 'dialog' is concerned with the C7-T1 (14x14cm) position claimed by some as the inshoot location. The following describes the location in medical terminology.

All About the C7-T1 Spinal Segment (Cervicothoracic Junction)
https://www.spine-health.com/conditions/spine-anatomy/cervical-spine-anatomy
by Stefano Sinicropi, MD.
[Peer Reviewed]

EXCERPTS

The C7-T1 spinal segment, sometimes referred to as the cervicothoracic junction is located at the very bottom of the neck. More specifically, this is where the neck connects with the upper back
[...]
This spinal segment is unique because it is the point of transition from the highly flexible neck to the nearly completely inflexible upper back.

[John Mytton]

Sure, Bill, sure. There's a thing in anatomy called the nape:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nape

The very first line at the above says the back of the neck.

Now if you want to argue and disagree over thousands of medical professionals who call that area the nape - that loose fold of skin that everyone has - vs a politician who was trying to further a square peg into a round hole - then you go right ahead. And you know, it's the same politician who pardoned one of the most corrupt US presidents in US history rather than let him face the consequences.

But it sure looks to me like that bullet hole is well below the nape, also known as the back of the neck.

But that's OK Bill. Let that old Kennedy bias hate creep in, blinding you to what's obvious to many more unbiased eyes.

Seconds later shots resounded in rapid succession. The President's hands moved to his neck. He appeared to stiffen momentarily and lurch slightly forward in his seat. A bullet had entered the base of the back of his neck slightly to the right of the spine.
https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/chapter-1











JohnM

[Michael Walton]

Sure, John, sure. You didn't even look at the neck link I posted. And here's a photo from your heroes.



That's NOT the neck, John. It's not. You're being very clever by posting that cutaway 3D photo that shows the spinal column because any dumbass would think that because the column is in the neck that makes the lower portion part of the neck. And it's not.

And it was not a mistake in the final report. They got it right the first time UNTIL old Gerry penciled in "...of neck."

But you go right on ahead and remain unbiased in your ANALysis.

[John Mytton]

Sure, John, sure. You didn't even look at the neck link I posted. And here's a photo from your heroes.



That's NOT the neck, John. It's not. You're being very clever by posting that cutaway 3D photo that shows the spinal column because any dumbass would think that because the column is in the neck that makes the lower portion part of the neck. And it's not.

And it was not a mistake in the final report. They got it right the first time UNTIL old Gerry penciled in "...of neck."

But you go right on ahead and remain unbiased in your ANALysis.

Calm down Michael, your post is unnecessarily offensive.

Here's JFK, show me where you think his neck is?



JohnM

[John Mytton]

Doesn't the jacket have to be bunched and the trajectory slope made sleeper? That's a cartoon for idiots.

Doesn't the jacket have to be bunched

 

That's a cartoon for idiots.

Exactly, that's precisely the audience that gobbles up such illogical absurdities.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Bunch?  What bunch?

[Michael Walton]

Sure, John, sure. Sure, Bill, sure.

Here's my all-time favorite photo about this whole sordid deal. Here's your heroes again. Not us wacky and fun-loving conspiracy theorists but, you know, officialdom:



See the two markers on the stand-in? Do you know why they have TWO markers? It's very simple, Bill and John (and Jerry). First, they know what the medical evidence is. So now, after some lawyer tells them, "Well, we know your boss wants no questions about this. The playboy is gone and we can do all manner of fudging (and xxxing around with) the evidence. It's just gotta be one shooter from right up thar."

So they know the medical history. A hole in the throat (hence the sticker on the stand-in's back of the neck) and the lower sticker. Even G-Men know where the back of the neck and the back are located for crissake! And, you know, the EXACT SAME HOLES we see in the autopsy photos. So they put the stickers there to somehow - SOME WAY - try to figure it out during this reenactment.

Only they can't. It's not possible. The bullet's traveling downward, yet the stickers are going UPWARD. Duh, much?

So hence, the final report is honest ("back") until old Gerry pencils in "back of neck."

As John I says above, there was no bunch. But even if there was, it doesn't change anything. All you gotta do is look at the autopsy photo of the back. Even if the jacket had a hole way down the bottom due to bunching (but ALAS it doesn't) the back wound in the photo shows they got it right in the above photo like they got it right with the stickers.

Now if you guys want to let your Kennedy bias kick in again and go all like, "BUT BUT BUT what about this...or that...or this..." - then you go right ahead. And I'm sure you will. But all the bias in the world is not going to change what's obvious in these photos as well as the autopsy.

'Night John Boy. 'Night Mary Ellen.