JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
JFK's Dramatic Z226-232 Reaction: More Proof that the SBT Is a Silly Myth
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on June 08, 2025, 05:46:06 PM ---Do you really want to challenge there being a "third shot"? Do you have an issue with the "3 Hulls" on the floor of the sniper's nest?
--- End quote ---
Storing,
Why were two of the hulls found close together under the window and the other one found far to the shooter's right?
Jack Nessan:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on June 08, 2025, 05:46:06 PM --- Do you really want to challenge there being a "third shot"? Do you have an issue with the "3 Hulls" on the floor of the sniper's nest?
--- End quote ---
Not even going to try and prove there was a third shot? Pretending to be a squid and trying to ink the water to get away? Three shells do not mean anything at all.
How about explain the rationale to your sudden change of conspiracies. You are a huge proponent of the Knotts Lab fiasco because it suggests two shooters with one trajectory from outer space and a bullet that goes through JFK and then disappears. Now you are a proponent of all three shots having been taken from the SN and forget the Knotts Lab debacle, because there were three shell casings found there? Seriously, can you track a thought from one sentence to the next?
Steve M. Galbraith:
--- Quote from: Jack Nessan on June 09, 2025, 03:39:05 PM ---Not even going to try and prove there was a third shot? Pretending to be a squid and trying to ink the water to get away? Three shells do not mean anything at all.
How about explain the rationale to your sudden change of conspiracies. You are a huge proponent of the Knotts Lab fiasco because it suggests two shooters with one trajectory from outer space and a bullet that goes through JFK and then disappears. Now you are a proponent of all three shots having been taken from the SN and forget the Knotts Lab debacle, because there were three shell casings found there? Seriously, can you track a thought from one sentence to the next?
--- End quote ---
I guess his grassy knoll/fence shooter was thrown under the conspiracy bus? Gordon Arnold and all? The rear exit wound witnesses? Gonna' need a bigger bus eventually.
It's a conspiracy cafeteria where conspiracy believers take one of that and one of those and maybe a couple of those over there and create their conspiracy meal. It's all at odds with one another, contradictory and illogical. But it doesn't have to make sense; it just has to fit into whatever conspiracy du jour they are having that day.
Rube Goldberg scheme, conspiracy cafeteria..whatever analogy you want to use. They just grab stuff and run with it. It doesn't matter whether it contradicts what they said yesterday.
Jack Nessan:
--- Quote from: Steve M. Galbraith on June 09, 2025, 05:18:12 PM ---I guess his grassy knoll/fence shooter was thrown under the conspiracy bus? Gordon Arnold and all? The rear exit wound witnesses? Gonna' need a bigger bus eventually.
It's a conspiracy cafeteria where conspiracy believers take one of that and one of those and maybe a couple of those over there and create their conspiracy meal. It's all at odds with one another, contradictory and illogical. But it doesn't have to make sense; it just has to fit into whatever conspiracy du jour they are having that day.
Rube Goldberg scheme, conspiracy cafeteria..whatever analogy you want to use. They just grab stuff and run with it. It doesn't matter whether it contradicts what they said yesterday.
--- End quote ---
Good analysis. This is an excellent description of their thinking. A third grader can unravel their logic. You would think they would be embarrassed by it but must not be because it just goes from one goofy theory to another without pause or thought.
Michael T. Griffith:
--- Quote from: Jack Nessan on June 09, 2025, 03:39:05 PM ---Not even going to try and prove there was a third shot? Pretending to be a squid and trying to ink the water to get away? Three shells do not mean anything at all.
How about explain the rationale to your sudden change of conspiracies. You are a huge proponent of the Knotts Lab fiasco because it suggests two shooters with one trajectory from outer space and a bullet that goes through JFK and then disappears. Now you are a proponent of all three shots having been taken from the SN and forget the Knotts Lab debacle, because there were three shell casings found there? Seriously, can you track a thought from one sentence to the next?
--- End quote ---
I find it impossible to take you seriously. I don't where or how you formed some of these assumptions about my views. I also can't believe that anyone in 2025 is claiming there were only two shots, given everything we now know about missed shots and extra bullets in Dealey Plaza and in the limo.
As for your erroneous description of the Knott Laboratory SBT trajectory analysis, this makes it especially hard for me to feel inclined to waste time responding to you. The Knott Lab analysis is the most thorough, data-based, and comprehensive SBT analysis ever done. It dwarfs all previous analyses. If the Knott Lab analysis had confirmed the SBT, you guys would be joyfully embracing it and noting that Knott Lab has vast experience and credentials in digital forensic reconstruction, that the analysis was based on millions of data points to form a digital duplicate of Dealey Plaza, and that it used a wide variety of photographic evidence in conjunction with the laser scan of Dealey Plaza. But, since the Knott Lab analysis destroys the SBT, you guys lamely seek to dismiss it, even while you accept the pathetic and contradictory trajectory analyses done by the WC, Thomas Canning, Todd Vaughan, and Dale Myers.
Finally, I'll just note that you're not even trying to address the dramatic jolting forward of JFK in Z226-232, the second most dramatic reaction in the entire Zapruder film, because it destroys the lapel-flip SBT.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version