JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
JFK's Dramatic Z226-232 Reaction: More Proof that the SBT Is a Silly Myth
Tim Nickerson:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on May 29, 2025, 11:32:55 PM --- SA Kelley NEVER testified that he actually measured the distance from the edge of the jump seat to the edge of the Limo Door. And, the date Kelley gave for the SS Reconstruction he participated in, was actually the "2nd" SS Reconstruction and did NOT use the JFK Limo. Kelley was questioned by Specter who dreamed up the SBT. Specter knew exactly what he needed to make the SBT remotely plausible. Specter was getting his ducks inna row, Take 2. Also, it was very clever of Specter to NOT ask Kelley the distance from the (L) edge of Gov Connally's jump seat to the Hump running down the center of the JFK Limo.
--- End quote ---
Kelley doesn't say that he actually measured the distance, that's true. The edge of the door was recessed inboard of where the edge of the car was next to JFK. If one goes by the Hess & Eisenhardt diagram, Connally's seat was about 3.5 inches inboard of the edge of the car next to where JFK was seated. Connally shifting over in his seat as he turned to look around placed him well inboard of JFK. ITEK placed him as much as 8.6 inches inboard of JFK. The Itek film analysis is the gold standard. You'll never be able to put the wound on Connally out of range of the SB trajectory no matter how much you try.
Specter never dreamed up the SBT. He came to the realization of it together with other WC staff lawyers. They were extremely slow in coming to that realization.
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Tim Nickerson on May 30, 2025, 01:32:02 AM ---Kelley doesn't say that he actually measured the distance, that's true. The edge of the door was recessed inboard of where the edge of the car was next to JFK. If one goes by the Hess & Eisenhardt diagram, Connally's seat was about 3.5 inches inboard of the edge of the car next to where JFK was seated. Connally shifting over in his seat as he turned to look around placed him well inboard of JFK. ITEK placed him as much as 8.6 inches inboard of JFK. The Itek film analysis is the gold standard. You'll never be able to put the wound on Connally out of range of the SB trajectory no matter how much you try.
Specter never dreamed up the SBT. He came to the realization of it together with other WC staff lawyers. They were extremely slow in coming to that realization.
--- End quote ---
They were "extremely slow" because they were forced to keep changing the shots sequence. Specter et al knew the final result had to be 3 shots/1 shooter per LBJ/J Edgar phone call. And then came the chipped curb/Tague. That was another monkey wrench thrown into the works they had to "work" around. I have proved: (1) That is Not Officer Haygood inside the railroad yard on the Darnell Film, and (2) Those "Huge Gates" leading to the TSBD 1st Floor Stairwell were "Wide Open" before and after the Kill Shot. And currently, I am working on that "Lost Bullet" fired by a 2nd Shooter per the HSCA. Yeah, it did happen. .......................... STAY TUNED ............................
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on May 30, 2025, 02:10:57 AM ---They were "extremely slow" because they were forced to keep changing the shots sequence. Specter et al knew the final result had to be 3 shots/1 shooter per LBJ/J Edgar phone call. And then came the chipped curb/Tague. That was another monkey wrench thrown into the works they had to "work" around. I have proved: (1) That is Not Officer Haygood inside the railroad yard on the Darnell Film, and (2) Those "Huge Gates" leading to the TSBD 1st Floor Stairwell were "Wide Open" before and after the Kill Shot. And currently, I am working on that "Lost Bullet" fired by a 2nd Shooter per the HSCA. Yeah, it did happen. .......................... STAY TUNED ............................
--- End quote ---
Storing,
You never did answer my question:
How many bad guys and really, really bad gals do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, the escaping, and the all-important cover up?
Just a few, or oodles and gobs?
Tim Nickerson:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on May 30, 2025, 02:10:57 AM --- They were "extremely slow" because they were forced to keep changing the shots sequence. Specter et al knew the final result had to be 3 shots/1 shooter per LBJ/J Edgar phone call. And then came the chipped curb/Tague. That was another monkey wrench thrown into the works they had to "work" around. I have proved: (1) That is Not Officer Haygood inside the railroad yard on the Darnell Film, and (2) Those "Huge Gates" leading to the TSBD 1st Floor Stairwell were "Wide Open" before and after the Kill Shot. And currently, I am working on that "Lost Bullet" fired by a 2nd Shooter per the HSCA. Yeah, it did happen. .......................... STAY TUNED ............................
--- End quote ---
They never changed the shot sequence. The Tague strike had nothing to do with the SBT. The Tague strike never became an issue until June 1964. They were talking among themselves about the SBT as early as March and they were duplicating the vertical angle of it in May. Your points 1 and 2 have nothing to do with the SBT. There was no second shooter.
Royell Storing:
I understand the Old Guard JFK Assassination Research Community being embarrassed with respect to the JFK Assassination discoveries I have made in a very short period of time. If I were a member of this "club", I would be embarrassed too. The HSCA declared that a 4th Shot/Missed Shot by a 2nd shooter was made on 11/22/63. Josiah Thompson stands behind that HSCA finding/Dictabelt to this day. I am now working on pinning down that 4th shot/Lost Bullet.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version