Ever wonder why the hardcore CT's try to create doubt about the Zapruder Film?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ever wonder why the hardcore CT's try to create doubt about the Zapruder Film?  (Read 15224 times)

Offline Jim Hawthorn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
So this is another thing you haven't mapped, Jim?
The missing scalp at the top begins in front of the ear, just like it's shown in clear frames like Z317, Z323, Z335 and so on.
Allowing for the changing lines-of-sight in the latter frames, I see no difference in the relationship of the head wound features.

Then how do you explain this image, with the upper cranium absent?


Offline Jim Hawthorn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
Have you ever read the Zavada report?

No Dan. Could you point me to it please?

Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
No Dan. Could you point me to it please?

This is the version I use:

https://archive.org/details/ZavadaReport

It's the most comprehensive examination of the film possible, made by one of the team leaders of the team that invented the film Zapruder used.
Zavada was considered the world's leading expert on Kodachrome II at the time of the report.

Offline Jim Hawthorn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
This is the version I use:

https://archive.org/details/ZavadaReport

It's the most comprehensive examination of the film possible, made by one of the team leaders of the team that invented the film Zapruder used.
Zavada was considered the world's leading expert on Kodachrome II at the time of the report.

Thanks! I'll give it a read.

Offline Jim Hawthorn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
This is the version I use:

https://archive.org/details/ZavadaReport

It's the most comprehensive examination of the film possible, made by one of the team leaders of the team that invented the film Zapruder used.
Zavada was considered the world's leading expert on Kodachrome II at the time of the report.

That is a huge, in-depth report! I haven't the time to go through it all but I guess what your point is that the Zapruder film wasn't tampered with, wasn't retouched.

In that case, the differences in the state of Kennedy's cranium between the two frames that I posted proves that there were 2 almost simultaneous bullet impacts to the head.
Unless you have a another explanation?

Offline Jim Hawthorn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 306


Not cranium being pointed to. Blood-drenched hair or scalp flaps (they're pretty red in the autopsy photos).

The opening of scalp at the top is mostly forward of a line drawn forward of the ear.

The scalp opening reaches up to the top of the head. Kind of interesting how the Zapruder film has the scalp opening in the exact same location as the autopsy photos. Cue the alterationists.

No, the mass at the summit of the head (which looks like hair covered cranium, not a wound, is absent a few frames later:




« Last Edit: March 04, 2024, 11:14:45 PM by Jim Hawthorn »