Ever wonder why the hardcore CT's try to create doubt about the Zapruder Film?

[Dan O'meara]

Explain.

The top picture is really blurry.
The bottom picture is really clear.

Next!

[Dan O'meara]

image uploading

Frame 337.
I've drawn in a red outline to highlight the state of JFK's head at this point.
Earlier frames show skull and brain matter being blown out of the top of JFK's head.
The image above shows a massive crater in the top of his head.
The autopsy pictures show the top of JFK's head missing.

The problems arise because the true nature of JFK's head injury is little understood. In the picture above I have pointed out a large section of JFK's skull bone clearly visible on the side of his head. His skull is supposed to be on the inside, not the outside.
The red mass surrounding the bone is the inside of JFK's scalp, to which the bone is still attached.
As the pieces of skull are blown out of the top of his head, the scalp is ripped open. The pressure (due to cavitation) causing JFK's head to 'explode' blows a massive piece of scalp over the right side of his head. The inside of this piece of scalp with a bone attached is clearly visible.
However, the scalp is still attached to the head near the ear. This attachment acts as a hinge. On the way to the hospital Jackie tries to put her husband's head back together. She takes the large piece of scalp and places it back where it should be. When JFK arrives at Parkland this massive piece of scalp is back in place. This is why many of the doctors who work on JFK at Parkland are unaware of the full extent of the injury to his head. To them it looks like the injury is located only at the back of the head when in fact the injury takes up nearly the whole side of the upper right side of his head from front to back.
When JFK's body arrives at Bethesda, Jenkins describes taking the wrappings off JFK's head and the massive piece of hinged scalp that came away with the wrappings but could be put back in place, hiding the full extent of the injury.

For the undoubted authenticity of the Zapruder film read the Roland Zavada report. It is a truly comprehensive investigation of every single aspect of the film by one of the men who led the team which invented Kodachrome II, the film Zapruder used.

The only problem I have is with the way the bullet behaved upon impact. Is anyone else aware of an example of the type of bullet supposedly used in the assassination fragmenting in such a way. Any re-enactments I've seen show the bullet for the head shot staying in one piece.. Can such a bullet leave a trail of fine, metallic dust as it travels through JFK's head?
It seems a bit dodgy to me, but I'm no ballistics expert..

[Jim Hawthorn]

Frame 337.
I've drawn in a red outline to highlight the state of JFK's head at this point.
Earlier frames show skull and brain matter being blown out of the top of JFK's head.
The image above shows a massive crater in the top of his head.

Right, so what do you make of this:

[Dan O'meara]

Right, so what do you make of this:

I've already answered this question.
Look at Jackie's face, there's no features. The frame is really blurry so it's difficult to make a proper assessment.

[Jim Hawthorn]

I've already answered this question.
Look at Jackie's face, there's no features. The frame is really blurry so it's difficult to make a proper assessment.

No, you haven't answered the question. Blurring merely masks the detail of a surface. It doesn't create or extend zones on tone/matter. Despite the lack of sharp definition, we can clearly see in the frame that the upper cranium area, a good 6" above the right ear is intact. A few frames later, it's no longer there.
So again, how would you explain what we see?

[Royell Storing]

  Were the photos above taken Before Or After Humes took the bone saw to the top of JFK's head? Be careful now. The aging Humes documented in his ARRB Testimony that he saw the body of JFK arrive at Bethesda BEFORE the hearse carrying Jackie and the ceremonial casket arrived there.

[Dan O'meara]

No, you haven't answered the question. Blurring merely masks the detail of a surface. It doesn't create or extend zones on tone/matter. Despite the lack of sharp definition, we can clearly see in the frame that the upper cranium area, a good 6" above the right ear is intact. A few frames later, it's no longer there.
So again, how would you explain what we see?

Jerry seems to have it covered.
Have you ever read the Zavada report?