Vicki Adams: The Lost Interview

[Martin Weidmann]

Absurdity is exactly right. Who saw him handling the SN Boxes that day as part of his job? A whole floor full of people and no one did. They want to pretend LHO was not there but the simple fact his fingerprints are the common denominator in all the evidence and directly implicates him. The rifle was in his possession. His fingerprints were directly on the SN rifle rest, rifle and bag. Then he cannot tell the same story twice as to his whereabouts during the assassination. Finally, he admits he was coming down the stairs. He was seen walking into the lunchroom. Your list is excellent, it in itself tells the story and leaves no doubt. The fingerprints on the SN boxes have a limited time span.

Now this is the funny part with conspiracy people. Martin will want to ask a question he feels deflects the conversation from their weak, no evidence argument.

Who saw him handling the SN Boxes that day as part of his job?

Nobody needs to see him. His prints are on the boxes (if the "evidence" is to be believed) so he must have handled them.

A whole floor full of people and no one did.

You are losing me quickly

They want to pretend LHO was not there but the simple fact his fingerprints are the common denominator in all the evidence and directly implicates him.

What is this madness? Of course Oswald was there. He was seen on the 6th floor before the floor laying crew went down. But fingerprints on boxes an order filler has to handle as part of his job do not implicate him!

The rifle was in his possession.

Really? Are you just making this up or do you have actual evidence to back up this bold claim. If you have, please present it and I will gladly change my mind.

Finally, he admits he was coming down the stairs.

Says who?

He was seen walking into the lunchroom.

Actually, no he wasn't. But even if he was, if he was trying to leave the TSBD as quickly as possible, why would he even had stayed in the lunchroom, when he could just as easily have walked through the 2nd floor office space and leave the building?

Your list is excellent, it in itself tells the story and leaves no doubt. The fingerprints on the SN boxes have a limited time span.

His list is already debunked, but it's no surprise that you don't understand that.

[John Mytton]

Your list is excellent, it in itself tells the story and leaves no doubt. The fingerprints on the SN boxes have a limited time span.

His list is already debunked, but it's no surprise that you don't understand that.

 

Debunked by who, you? LOL!

JohnM

[Jack Nessan]

Who saw him handling the SN Boxes that day as part of his job?

Nobody needs to see him. His prints are on the boxes (if the "evidence" is to be believed) so he must have handled them.

A whole floor full of people and no one did.

You are losing me quickly

They want to pretend LHO was not there but the simple fact his fingerprints are the common denominator in all the evidence and directly implicates him.

What is this madness? Of course Oswald was there. He was seen on the 6th floor before the floor laying crew went down. But fingerprints on boxes an order filler has to handle as part of his job do not implicate him!

The rifle was in his possession.

Really? Are you just making this up or do you have actual evidence to back up this bold claim. If you have, please present it and I will gladly change my mind.

Finally, he admits he was coming down the stairs.

Says who?

He was seen walking into the lunchroom.

Actually, no he wasn't. But even if he was, if he was trying to leave the TSBD as quickly as possible, why would he even had stayed in the lunchroom, when he could just as easily have walked through the 2nd floor office space and leave the building?

Your list is excellent, it in itself tells the story and leaves no doubt. The fingerprints on the SN boxes have a limited time span.

His list is already debunked, but it's no surprise that you don't understand that.

John presents a list of facts. You present a list of meaningless questions. Pretty typical of a conspiracist. Just a pretense of knowledge.

[Martin Weidmann]

"there were cops in the area west of the TSBD before the order to seal off the TSNB was given.

Will you ever stop contradicting yourself. You have the cop telling Adams and Styles apparently the only two people involved your fantasy lockdown. Being West of the building was the grassy knoll.

"I don't even know what that means. Styles re-entered the TSBD at the front entrance before the building was sealed off, so who cares about the statements and movements of the people actively locking down the TSBD?"

This seems about par. That is right, you do not know what it means and no amount of explaining seems to be able to reach you. Maybe that is because you are so unbiased in assessing evidence.

You do not seem to even understand that the front was locked down at 12:37. The back at 12:36. Those are different times. They were turned back by the cops Harkness placed there at 12:36.

"there were cops in the area west of the TSBD before the order to seal off the TSNB was given.

Will you ever stop contradicting yourself. You have the cop telling Adams and Styles apparently the only two people involved your fantasy lockdown. Being West of the building was the grassy knoll.

You could just as easily be talking Chinese. You are not making any kind of sense. West of the building was a parking space and railroad tracks. The grassy knoll was much further away. You clearly have never been to the scene of the crime!

This seems about par. That is right, you do not know what it means and no amount of explaining seems to be able to reach you. Maybe that is because you are so unbiased in assessing evidence.

You do not seem to even understand that the front was locked down at 12:37. The back at 12:36. Those are different times. They were turned back by the cops Harkness placed there at 12:36.

Can you be more stupid than this? Styles re-entered the TSBD at the front entrance before it was sealed off. If it was sealed of at 12:37, it means that Styles entered the building prior to 12:37.

You, however claim that Adams and Styles were stopped by an officer at the back of the building at 12:36 and were told to re-enter.

You don't even understand you've just destroyed your own argument. It's hilarious!

[Martin Weidmann]

Debunked by who, you? LOL!

JohnM

I didn't expect you to see it that way. That's what you get with fanatical zealots...

It's not really my problem that you are unwilling to consider the actual evidence honestly.

Did you really think that I was under the impression that you would have the personality and the capacity to admit that you were wrong? Not for a second, mate!

It's your biggest mistake and weakness to think you are always right about everything, when in fact somebody who feels the need to tell the world that he never fails is really a demonstation a massive amount of insecurity and weakness. People who are really confident and correct in their arguments and logic don't have the need to tell the world just how brilliant they are. They just let their logic and arguments speak for themselves. Poor Johnny.....

[Martin Weidmann]

John presents a list of facts. You present a list of meaningless questions. Pretty typical of a conspiracist. Just a pretense of knowledge.

Questions are never meaningless, except perhaps to those who can not answer them.

If your and John's fairytale is true, you should be able to easily answer the questions asked, right? So why don't you?

[Jack Nessan]

You could just as easily be talking Chinese. You are not making any kind of sense. West of the building was a parking space and railroad tracks. The grassy knoll was much further away. You clearly have never been to the scene of the crime!

This seems about par. That is right, you do not know what it means and no amount of explaining seems to be able to reach you. Maybe that is because you are so unbiased in assessing evidence.

You do not seem to even understand that the front was locked down at 12:37. The back at 12:36. Those are different times. They were turned back by the cops Harkness placed there at 12:36.

Can you be more stupid than this? Styles re-entered the TSBD at the front entrance before it was sealed off. If it was sealed of at 12:37, it means that Styles entered the building prior to 12:37.

You, however claim that Adams and Styles were stopped by and officer at the back of the building at 12:36 and were told to re-enter.

You don't even understand you've just destroyed your own argument. It's hilarious!

How about explain the argument? Make sure you use your timeline. Give up on it? You know with your imaginary cop?

Apparently, you did not know that Adams and Styles in their statements stated they were told by a cop to go back at 12:36. You think they just went back on their own. Adams was stopped before she reentered the building.