Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist  (Read 18500 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5140
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #28 on: December 30, 2023, 10:46:51 PM »
     JOHN - I have Willis 5 + the WC Testimony of Emmett Hudson corroborating 2 MEN on The Steps. You have....

YAWN! I have Moorman's photo which was widely available the day after and Muchmore's corroborated 8mm film and you have testimony that doesn't say what you say it does and your amateur interpretation of a poorly analyzed photo. When you scrounge up some more evidence which is actually believable then get back to me. K?





I rest my case!

JohnM

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5046
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #29 on: December 30, 2023, 11:04:38 PM »
   Why are you omitting Willis 5? Gotta be because it shows ONLY 2 MEN on The Steps. Stop with your attempted Sham.
   Why not get down to the brass tacks? How do we know that Emmett Hudson is the man wearing the light colored slacks? I've Never seen a photograph of Emmett Hudson. How about we verify the man wearing the light colored slacks is Emmett Hudson? Or maybe, that can Not be done?
« Last Edit: December 30, 2023, 11:08:50 PM by Royell Storing »

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5140
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #30 on: December 30, 2023, 11:26:53 PM »
Why not get down to the brass tacks? How do we know that Emmett Hudson is the man wearing the light colored slacks?

Hudson's testimony is one of only two pieces of evidence that you think provides proof of two men on the steps and now with this sudden departure, you are solely left with one badly interpreted photograph! You just can't make up this level of incompetence, Hilarious!

JohnM

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5046
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #31 on: December 30, 2023, 11:33:33 PM »
Hudson's testimony is one of only two pieces of evidence that you think provides proof of two men on the steps and now with this sudden departure, you are solely left with one badly interpreted photograph! You just can't make up this level of incompetence, Hilarious!

JohnM

    That's not an answer. Not even a good attempt at dodging what You Do Not Know. Just admit it and we can move on Gomer.

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5140
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #32 on: December 31, 2023, 12:18:22 AM »
    That's not an answer. Not even a good attempt at dodging what You Do Not Know. Just admit it and we can move on Gomer.

You're a complete novice and totally unaware of the historical record, who wasn't even aware that Moorman's photo and Muchmore's film completely destroys your opinion, and now that you've thrown one of only two of your pieces of evidence under a bus, you are frantically back pedaling. OUCH!





JohnM

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5046
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #33 on: December 31, 2023, 02:32:03 AM »
You're a complete novice and totally unaware of the historical record, who wasn't even aware that Moorman's photo and Muchmore's film completely destroys your opinion, and now that you've thrown one of only two of your pieces of evidence under a bus, you are frantically back pedaling. OUCH!





JohnM

             The discussion here has ALWAYS BEEN, why do other images show 3 MEN vs Willis 5 showing 2 MEN standing on The Steps? Where have You been Gomer? Oh yeah. On TILT!

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5046
Re: Rosemary Willis: conspiracy theorist
« Reply #34 on: December 31, 2023, 02:35:32 AM »
It shows the same 3 men as seen in the other images  :)





   BUMP.       2 MEN Standing on The Steps
« Last Edit: December 31, 2023, 02:36:36 AM by Royell Storing »