CTers do you have any evidence other than hearsay?

[Steve M. Galbraith]

"sky is the limit."

You mean like "Jackie did it", or "the driver did it", "it was a hoax", or "Kennedy was an alien", or "GHWBush did it" Hilarious Jack.

Remember, "they" can do anything. And apparently, they did.

If we ask how did "they" do "A" or "B" or "C", we get the usual bogeyman of how awful Hoover and LBJ and Angleton were. How did "they" plant the rifle? "They just did". How did they know Oswald didn't have an alibi, that he wasn't with several people at the time of the shooting? "They just did."

"The sky's the limit" indeed.

This is conspiracy worldview first and then finding the evidence to support that view. When you have an event like the JFK assassination that has been studied to this degree - we literally have thousands of pieces of information on it - you can select a piece here and a piece there to support your conspiracy.

But it all has to start with a "the sky's the limit" view. That if it could be done then it simply was.

[John Iacoletti]

Still waiting for Wesley to show "ballistic evidence that was linked to Oswald".



Just what the forum needs -- another arrogant LNer making claims about the case that aren't true.

[Brian Walker]

CTers, could one of you cite any solid, physical, or ballistic evidence that points to anyone other than Oswald or a second shooter? Most of you always claim that there is no physical or ballistic evidence linked to Oswald. So, convince the rest of us by naming the evidence you have. I don't mean the usual smoke and mirrors you guys put out. I mean evidence. Like maybe a rifle, bullet, fragment, prints. Anything at all will do.

That is not how Defense Lawyers usually work.