A Topic for LN's: What is a CT?

[Jack Trojan]

To me a CTer is a person who insists, beyond a reasonable standard of proof, that Oswald needed help

That's your problem. A CTer is a person who looks at all the circumstantial evidence re the JFK assassination and leans toward Oswald likely not acting alone. CTers represent the majority of the world who give a damn. And for that the fringe LNers label CTers as tin foil hat wearing kooks. Go figure.

[John Iacoletti]

How is it this evidence does not prove this?

Because the only part of your "paper trail" that connects Oswald personally to a Klein's rifle order is unscientific handwriting "analysis" of 2 block letters on a photograph of a microfilm copy of a 2-inch order coupon.

No fakery is necessary -- just a questionable conclusion based on the actual available evidence.

[John Iacoletti]

This is where you fail, isn't the criteria "reasonable doubt by a reasonable person" and you have repeatedly shown yourself not to be a reasonable person, therefore in my estimation you would not be picked to be on a jury and thus your repeated use of "reasonable doubt" is simply self serving nonsense!

The problem is that you define "reasonable person" as someone who agrees with your unsubstantiated claims and assumptions.  Your position has nothing to do with reason.

[Tim Nickerson]

Lee Harvey Oswald did not kill John F. Kennedy.

Lee Henry Oswald did.

Or Harvey Lee Oswald did.

I can never keep them straight.

Steve Thomas

What about Lee Harold Oswald? Let's not forget him.