RIP to the Single-bullet theory?

[Michael Welch]

Hi Everybody, Is this the bullet captured on film on November 22, 1963? It is the silver object about an inch and a half long stuck where the bubble top would go about 24 inches behind Clint Hill's left hand where a curve begins. Sincerely yours, Michael

[Michael Welch]

Hi Everybody, Is this the bullet captured on film on November 22, 1963? It is the silver object about an inch and a half long stuck where the bubble top would go about 24 inches behind Clint Hill's left hand where a curve begins. Sincerely yours, Michael

Here is a picture of the same area on the limo earlier in the day of November 22, 1963. I do not see the bullet shaped object there. Do you? Sincerely yours, Michael




In this Croft photo taken right before the bullets started to fly or maybe taken during the initial missed shots because Jackie is looking to her left, there is no shiny object yet. The shiny object has a certain radiance and depth that the reflections do not have. There may be a leaf or two located more towards the middle area.

[Jack Nessan]

Yeah, we have the WC initially working on a 2 Shots Fired scenario, and then there's the Carcano being ID'd as a Mauser, and don't forget that for roughly 40 yrs the Wiegman film was erroneously ballyhoo'd as being filmed "continuously" along with the Bogus ID of McKinnon/Mumford. But all of that is hunky dory in the Lone Nut World.

 

“Yeah, we have the WC initially working on a 2 Shots Fired scenario,”  

Good point Royell. Maybe you can elaborate on the WC "working" on a two shot scenario.

Unless you are talking about something in the Ball- Balin report, I was unaware the WC did any actual work on the fact there was only two shots fired, the WC did note it in their conclusion and stated the problem with the witnesses having been influenced by the media.

The one thing that has never changed in Paul’s memory, is Paul Landis still maintained there were only two shots. It was two shots in 1963 and two shots today. The second shot being the headshot. How about explaining JBC’s wound with this in mind. Paul found what bullet? It looks like SBT is the only answer that is possible. Are you thinking JFK somehow shot Gov Connally?

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

That bright area about 1" long is a reflexion of the Sun.
I wonder whether Landis can tell us (show us) exactly where the slug was sitting.

[Michael Welch]

That bright area about 1" long is a reflexion of the Sun.
I wonder whether Landis can tell us (show us) exactly where the slug was sitting.

Hi Marjan, No by Clint Hill's hand there appears to be a little reflection of the sun. You can see it in the picture of the limo from earlier in the day as well. There is no 1 inch sun spot earlier in the day. This is an actual object. It is right where Paul Landis says he found it between the leather and the trunk where the bubble top is attached. Thank you for your reply! Sincerely yours, Michael

Check out around 13:10 on

[Jon Banks]

I posted the Phyllis Hall video earlier. She was a nurse who said she saw a bullet on Kennedy’s stretcher in the Parkland ER.

Thanks to Russ Baker, we now know there was a second nurse, Sharon Thouy, who also recalled seeing a bullet on top of bloody stretcher next to the Trauma room where Kennedy was being operated on

(She discusses the bullet around 4:23 in the clip)

Whether Landis is telling the truth or not, it seems plausible that the mostly intact bullet that was found at Parkland was from Kennedy’s stretcher, not Governor Connolly’s.

[Charles Collins]

Hi Everybody, Is this the bullet captured on film on November 22, 1963? It is the silver object about an inch and a half long stuck where the bubble top would go about 24 inches behind Clint Hill's left hand where a curve begins. Sincerely yours, Michael

I only see a mechanical “catch” that appears designed to hold the top in place and a couple of reflections of the sun on the curved part of the trim and the corner of the top of the back seat. Maybe you could point it out with an arrow or circle or something like that?