RIP to the Single-bullet theory?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?  (Read 164000 times)

Online David Von Pein

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 590
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #259 on: September 21, 2023, 04:22:47 PM »
Perhaps they are simply not interested in what somebody selling a book wrote in that book, with the benefit of hindsight and plenty of opportunity for revision of history.

Paul Landis in 2023, anyone?

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #260 on: September 21, 2023, 04:39:59 PM »
The official evidentiary record rested with the DPD on 11/22/63. The other personnel that Gary Savage wrote about and worked in the DPD crime lab were listed in the WC records. Yet Gary was apparently the first author to write about them. Why were none of the CT authors interested in them for the thirty years prior to Gary’s book?

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #261 on: September 21, 2023, 04:51:20 PM »
Ask an LN and they will tell you there was nothing wrong with Day lifting a print and not telling anybody about it for several days.

This is one of these things (on a very long list) that, when looked at it with an open mind, raises massive questions about the entire LN narrative.

   Agree. It's like Fritz pocketing a shell husk allegedly from the sniper's nest. And then we get people questioning there ever being a 2 shot scenario being considered in the face of official paper work listing only 2 hulls. They believe only what they want to believe. Forget the FACTS.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #262 on: September 21, 2023, 05:14:55 PM »
Paul Landis in 2023, anyone?

   "Revision of History"? People are dog piling SA Landis in the face of the current POTUS who Mon-Fri consistently does exactly this. Claims to have locked elbows with MLK and was jailed alongside Mandela, etc. Landis is small potatoes compared to the revision of history that is ongoing daily by people in positions of power.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8182
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #263 on: September 21, 2023, 05:23:42 PM »
Paul Landis in 2023, anyone?

Give him a call and tell him he is lying..... Go on then

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8182
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #264 on: September 21, 2023, 05:29:22 PM »
The official evidentiary record rested with the DPD on 11/22/63. The other personnel that Gary Savage wrote about and worked in the DPD crime lab were listed in the WC records. Yet Gary was apparently the first author to write about them. Why were none of the CT authors interested in them for the thirty years prior to Gary’s book?

The official evidentiary record rested with the DPD on 11/22/63.

True and they made a complete mess of it. But if you want to go that way; was the evidence card with the palmprint ever presented to the DPD evidence room and if so, where is the corresponding paperwork?

Why were none of the CT authors interested in them for the thirty years prior to Gary’s book?

Why ask me? Ask them....
« Last Edit: September 21, 2023, 06:23:47 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8182
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #265 on: September 21, 2023, 05:31:16 PM »
   "Revision of History"? People are dog piling SA Landis in the face of the current POTUS who Mon-Fri consistently does exactly this. Claims to have locked elbows with MLK and was jailed alongside Mandela, etc. Landis is small potatoes compared to the revision of history that is ongoing daily by people in positions of power.

Landis is small potatoes compared to the revision of history that is ongoing daily by people in positions of power.

That may be true, but he still has the entire LN clan throwing a hissy fit