RIP to the Single-bullet theory?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?  (Read 164676 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #140 on: September 14, 2023, 02:46:07 PM »
yea, at the end of April.

you, funny  :D


The reenactment took place in May. The theory originated in February. Tague had nothing to do with the origins of the Theory. Your claim is false.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #141 on: September 14, 2023, 02:49:57 PM »
Commission had no investigators on the ground and had to rely on the FBI

Not at all. The WC interviewed a multitude of witnesses. The WC hired many independent experts to examine the evidence. The WC questioned a lot of what the FBI provided. The SBT is a result of that.

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 791
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #142 on: September 14, 2023, 02:59:43 PM »
Not at all. The WC interviewed a multitude of witnesses. The WC hired many independent experts to examine the evidence. The WC questioned a lot of what the FBI provided. The SBT is a result of that.

Because of a missed shot having gone public. So called "independent experts" were called in to support a lone gunman theory.

WC Executive Session | Jan 22, 1964
A: They would like to have us fold up and quit.

Boggs: This closes the case, you see. Don't you see?
Dulles: Yes, I see that.

Rankin: They found the man. There is nothing more to do. The Commission supports their conclusions, and WC can go on home and that is
the end of it.

***************************
Jan 27th: The writer of the April memo Norman Redlich led the meeting on the Z film & Nix film  - to determine when the 3 shots had hit.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 05:34:51 PM by Michael Capasse »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #143 on: September 14, 2023, 03:13:16 PM »
Because of a missed shot having gone public. So called "independent experts" were called in to support a lone gunman theory.

WC Executive Session | Jan 27, 1964
A: They would like to have us fold up and quit.

Boggs: This closes the case, you see. Don't you see?
Dulles: Yes, I see that.

Rankin: They found the man. There is nothing more to do. The Commission supports their conclusions, and WC can go on home and that is
the end of it.

***************************
Jan 27th: The same day the writer of the April memo Norman Redlich led the meeting on the Z film & Nix film  - to determine when the 3 shots had hit.


You really should try reading something other than the ridiculous  BS: that the CT book authors want you to believe. You haven’t made any sense with this post. What point are you trying to make?

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 791
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #144 on: September 14, 2023, 03:15:37 PM »

You really should try reading something other than the ridiculous  BS: that the CT book authors want you to believe. You haven’t made any sense with this post. What point are you trying to make?

What book? - All are from the official documents
I count on you to post "opinions" from books  Thumb1:
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 03:22:02 PM by Michael Capasse »

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1400
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #145 on: September 14, 2023, 03:36:42 PM »
too funny  :D

April 27, 1964:
"Our report presumably will state that the President was hit by the first bullet, Governor Connally by the second, and the President by the third and fatal bullet. The report will also conclude that the bullets were fired by one person located in the sixth floor southeast corner window of the TSBD building."

Seems pretty clear that they were trying to bury Kennedy's throat wound and Tague's wound at least initially.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 03:37:26 PM by Jon Banks »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Reply #146 on: September 14, 2023, 03:45:22 PM »
What book? - All are from the official documents
I count on you to post "opinions" from books  Thumb1:

I ask again. What’s the point of that post? Is there one?