A question about Oswald

[Richard Smith]

Answer the question I asked. Here it is again;

Day claimed to have lifted the print on 11/22/63 and did not present it to anybody until 11/26/63. If he didn't forget to report the print, are you claiming he kept it back on purpose?

Whew.  So now it is not a week but four whole days!  I'm not claiming he kept it back on purpose or that he kept it back at all (whatever that means).  Kept it back from who?  He may very well have mentioned it to someone, but it was not documented.  He may have been busy under the circumstances.  It takes months for DNA results to be returned in modern investigations.  Does that mean the delay means the result must be faked?  You have no clue whatsoever what Day did or said with print.  BUT even if he didn't mention it to anyone for several days, that does not mean he faked the print.  That is insane.   There was an ongoing investigation.  The DPD detectives were collecting evidence.  The "reporting" part was ongoing.  If it took a few days to gather all the evidence that would be understandable.  To suggest it must mean that he fabricated the print is complete lunacy.

[Martin Weidmann]

Same page as the above quote from “No More Silence” the paragraph just before that quote:

Before I got the picture made, another message came in: “Drop everything! Don’t do anything else!” It must have been 9:00 o’clock or later. “Drop everything! Don’t do anything else!” This came through my captain, Captain Doughty, but it probably came to him from Deputy Chief Lumpkin. So we didn’t complete what we were trying to do. I’d have probably been working on it all night if I’d had the time.

More morphing memories....

It still doesn't make any sense. What picture is he talking about? And even if he is told to "drop everything", how would that be enough to discontinue an examination of a print he allegedly found on the rifle. He was told to turn over all the evidence to the FBI, that same night, but according to his WC testimony he did not follow that instruction and held back the evidence card with the print.

Apart for anything else, as a forensic officer he must have understood the significance of a print found on the alleged murder weapon, yet he does nothing and keeps it in his desk drawer for days.... really?

 

[Charles Collins]

More morphing memories....

It still doesn't make any sense. What picture is he talking about? And even if he is told to "drop everything", how would that be enough to discontinue an examination of a print he allegedly found on the rifle. He was told to turn over all the evidence to the FBI, that same night, but according to his WC testimony he did not follow that instruction and held back the evidence card with the print.

Apart for anything else, as a forensic officer he must have understood the significance of a print found on the alleged murder weapon, yet he does nothing and keeps it in his desk drawer for days.... really?

The words in “No More Silence” are Carl Day’s words. Not Larry Sneed’s or anyone else’s. You made a claim that Day was told to turn over all the evidence. Who do you think told him that? And cite your source.

[Richard Smith]

 

Apart for anything else, as a forensic officer he must have understood the significance of a print found on the alleged murder weapon, yet he does nothing and keeps it in his desk drawer for days.... really?

Investigations take months or even years.  You are stupidly claiming because Day didn't report the print immediately that it must mean that he somehow fabricated evidence in the assassination of the president of the United States and brought it to light after the suspect was dead.  Risking his own career and prison to frame a dead man for a crime that the authorities were already satisfied he committed. LOL.  This is comedy gold.

[Martin Weidmann]

Investigations take months or even years.  You are stupidly claiming because Day didn't report the print immediately that it must mean that he somehow fabricated evidence in the assassination of the president of the United States and brought it to light after the suspect was dead.  Risking his own career and prison to frame a dead man for a crime that the authorities were already satisfied he committed. LOL.  This is comedy gold.

Investigations take months or even years.

Not when the suspect is killed within 48 hours in the basement of the police station

You are stupidly claiming because Day didn't report the print immediately that it must mean that he somehow fabricated evidence in the assassination of the president of the United States and brought it to light after the suspect was dead.  Risking his own career and prison to frame a dead man for a crime that the authorities were already satisfied he committed.

You're an idiot who can not deal with the known facts and constantly keeps on repeating pathetic made up strawman arguments which have already been debunked.

It's ironic that you keep fighting so hard against the possibility of a conspiracy in the Kennedy case while at the same time supporting a guy who claims the entire Government, all the courts, prosecutors and God knows who else is conspiring against him.

[Richard Smith]

Investigations take months or even years.

Not when the suspect is killed within 48 hours in the basement of the police station

You are stupidly claiming because Day didn't report the print immediately that it must mean that he somehow fabricated evidence in the assassination of the president of the United States and brought it to light after the suspect was dead.  Risking his own career and prison to frame a dead man for a crime that the authorities were already satisfied he committed.

You're an idiot who can not deal with the known facts and constantly keeps on repeating pathetic made up strawman arguments which have already been debunked.

It's ironic that you keep fighting so hard against the possibility of a conspiracy in the Kennedy case while at the same time supporting a guy who claims the entire Government, all the courts, prosecutors and God knows who else is conspiring against him.

Isn't it late in "Europa"?  LOL.  I've never suggested that there couldn't be a conspiracy in the JFK assassination.  There is simply no credible evidence.  If you want to accept the "official" story that the current US government and justice system is not corrupt, then knock yourself out, but the fact that I leave open the possibility of governmental abuse means that I have an open mind on the subject.  Rather than acting like a robot and entertaining only those narratives that I wish to be true. 

[John Iacoletti]

Rather than acting like a robot and entertaining only those narratives that I wish to be true.

That is exactly what you do with your “Oswald did it” narrative.