And how did you determine that evidence to be authentic?
Sorry Martin that's not how it works, if I have any reason to consider the evidence to be inauthentic, then please explain in detail why?JohnM
Sorry Martin that's not how it works,That's exactly how it works. You claim to have concluded, based on the evidence, that Bug's book is a "good book"That justifies the question what evidence it is you are talking about.
The same evidence that two separate inquiries 15 years apart concluded that Oswald pulled the trigger, now explain why it's your opinion that this evidence is not authentic?JohnM
It is the responsibility of the person invoking something as evidence to authenticate it. If he cannot do so, then there is reasonable doubt.
So, you don't actually know yourself, Your opinion is just based on a double appeal to authority. Wow!now explain why it's your opinion that this evidence is not authentic?Because Swiss cheese has less holes in it.
Because Swiss cheese has less holes in it.