The contrarians would have us believe it was just a matter of bad luck that the one and only time of his marriage that he left his wedding ring at home was on the morning of Nov. 22. Do they really believe this nonsense? All the circumstances that link Oswald to the crimes over and over and over again are all just bad luck.
How does leaving a ring behind “link Oswald to the crimes”? Talk about desperate.
The contrarians attempt to compartmentalize the evidence as though each piece is independent of all the other evidence against him.
What other evidence against him? You mean like a wedding ring? LOL.
Oswald worked in the building from which JFK was assassinated.
You don’t know where JFK was assassinated from.
He was one of the few people who we know was in the building at the moment the shots were fired.
And how exactly do we “know” this if he was unaccounted for at the time? By the way, at least 15 other people were “in the building at the time”.
Unlike most of the OTHER TSBD employees he was not in the presence of any of his coworkers who could provide him with an alibi.
Neither were at least 5 other employees. But who says it had to be an employee?
He also leaves his wedding ring at home for the very first time that very day. Bad luck. He also leaves his wife a large amount of money. Bad luck. All of this suggests some foreknowledge that he will not be returning when viewed in the totality of circumstances.
What it suggests is how desperate “Richard” is to label his overactive imagination “evidence”. Bad luck for “Richard” that it’s not.